David Lami refused to say whether the American attack on Iran was ‘right’ or ‘legal’

David Lami refused to say whether the American attack on Iran was 'right' or 'legal'

foreign Secretary David Lemy Refused to rescue Donald TrumpAttack and confirm Iran that it was either legal or even “to do the right thing”.

In a strange interview on BBC Radio 4’s Today program, Mr. Lamy was asked four times whether Air strikes of Donald Trump’s rule But Iranian nuclear facilities were legal.

“We were not involved, it is for Americans to discuss those legal issues,” they replied, avoiding the answer.

Questions followed the reports that the UK Attorney General Lord Hermer suggested that it would not be legal for the UK to start such an attack.

David Lami was unable to say whether the American attack was legal or correct ,Packet,

This issue is important due to the apprehension that it reduces the case against illegal invasion of Russia in Ukraine.

However, Mr. Lemy was also not able to respond whether the US B -2 stealth bombers were also “the right task to attack”.

BBC Radio 4 presenter Justin Web asked him: “Is (US) military action to do the right thing?”

Mr. Lammy avoided this question, replying: “I have said that we were not involved in military action.”

The web again asked: “Was it right to do this?”

Lemy replied: “What I have said is that eventually it can only be dealt with in diplomacy.”

The Foreign Secretary, who refused to answer difficult questions about the rapidly changing international crisis in the Middle East, was not the only senior minister.

Earlier, armed forces minister Luke Pollard claimed that it is “not” [him] To comment on ” American action in Middle EastRefusing to say whether Britain is supported US attacks in Iran.

ALSO READ  Starmer says that he was afraid of the postman after paying the bill through letterbox

Asked whether Britain was disappointed or happy about it military intervention, Leuk pollard Told Sky News: “Well, this is not to comment on me especially American action, but we are currently assessing the loss of war that we understand the actual limit of the strike.

Defense Minister Luke Pollard (Stephen Russo/PA)

Defense Minister Luke Pollard (Stephen Russo/PA) ,PA Archive,

“But our focus and the work that we are doing together with our American colleagues as well as people from all over Europe to talk back to pressurize the Iranian rule because a diplomatic solution is how we end this crisis.”

When it was placed to Mr. Pollard that this was especially his role to comment on military action around the world, he replied: “I am not going to be able to comment on the question, but what we can say is that we were not involved in military action that America took.”

He said that Britain’s attention was also to return to “pressurize the Iranian rule” because a diplomatic solution is how we end this crisis Iran A nuclear weapon is not able to create weapons, handing over their nuclear materials that they have, and commitments that they will not endanger regional stability by developing nuclear weapons in the future ”.

Over the weekend, the US attacked Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz which is associated with Iran’s nuclear program.

Next to the strike, the Prime Minister was calling for calm, saying that he “no doubt” that Mr. Trump has returned the G7 call to a de-siscality stress. Middle East,

ALSO READ  Tribute paid to 'selfless' mother killed during Skydiveing ​​tragedy in Devon

It is understood that there was no British participation in action but the government was informed before the US attacks.

After the strike, Sir Keir, supporting Mr. Trump’s administration, described Iran’s nuclear program as a “serious threat to international security”.

“Iran can never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, and the US has taken action to reduce that threat,” he said.

But later he warned that there was a threat to the Middle East crisis beyond the region and urged all the parties to return to the conversation.

Join WhatsApp

Join Now