home Secretary Amid concerns on privacy, have defended the expansion of the government of live facial recognition technology as “targeted” rifts on high-loss criminals.
Yweet cooper It was denied that the technology was being used to catch low-level crimes such as ticket-cuttings, as it had previously lived in Wales, and would control “safety measures and safety” deployment.
Critics including labor colleague barrows Shami chakrabarti In England, new plans have been attacked to roll 10 vans equipped with facial identification technology in seven police forces. Government Overhala of neighborhood policing.
Former Shadow Attorney General said that the expansion was a step towards the “total monitoring society” in the UK.
Asked if the rollout would violate the confidentiality of the people, Ms. Cooper said: “Okay, the way this technology is being used, he is to identify those who want to come back to jail, or who have failed to appear before the court, or who have failed to appear before the court, or who have violated things like the orders of sexual damage prevention.
“And I think it should be able to identify the proper legal safety measures and a legal framework in place, because there should be security measures and safety, but we should also be able to use technology to catch dangerous criminals and protect communities.”
In 2017, South Wales Police It was said that facial identity was being used to track suspects including ticket touts as a ready -ready force for the final of the Champions League in Cardiff.
It was pressurized whether she was happy for the technology to be deployed in this way, she said: “No, it is not that she (police in South Wales) used it.
“They use it to target where there is a serious organized crime, where there are criminal gangs, but in every case they use it, they clearly need safety measures and we need to ensure that we have found a new legal framework under it, and also that it can be used to protect serious crimes and protect communities.”
The ministers have said that a new legal structure will be prepared to support the use of technology after a consultation that starts this autumn.
The home office said the check would be done only against police surveillance for wanted criminals, suspects and the conditions of the order of the court such as sex criminals.
The van will be deployed in seven forces – Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Tems Valley and Hampshire – in the coming weeks.
They will be run by trained officers working within the College of Policing Guidance.
But Lady Chakraborty stated that the technique was “incredibly infiltrated” and “was completely more developed outside the law”.
He said, “Some people would say that this is another step towards the total monitoring society – challenges for privacy, challenges for the freedom of the assembly and the Sangh, and problems with the race and sex discrimination due to the high probability of false matches in terms of some groups,” he explained the Today’s Today’s Today’s Today’s Today’s Today’s Today.
“It is especially strange that it has all developed too much outside the law.”
He welcomed the plan to consult further with a potential new law, but to date warned, “This is a bit of a wild west”.
Policing Minister Dame Diana Johnson dismissed the claims, stating the BBC breakfast: “With the biggest respect, it is not what it is.
“This is about giving equipment to our police officers so that they are able to keep us safe.”
The army, already deploying live facial recognition, used it to break the terms of sexual criminals along with suspects of rape, domestic misconduct, knife crime and robbery.
The UK’s Data Protection Watchdog warned that the technique does not work in the “legal vacuum”, and the police should use it with “people who respected the rights and freedom of the people”.
A spokesman for the office of the Information Commissioner said: “(Facial Recognition Technology) is covered by data protection law, which requires any use of personal data including biometric data to be valid, fair and proportional.
“When used by the police, FRT should be deployed in such a way that respects people’s rights and freedom, with proper safety measures.
“FRT is a priority for ICO due to its potential benefits and risks.”
Meanwhile, the Home Office stated that every community in England and Wales was now handed over a “nominated, contactable” officer to handle the reports of crimes such as anti -social behavior.
Their details will be made available to the residents on their local force website, it is understood.
The pledge was made as part of the government’s first announced neighborhood policing guarantee, under which the forces have signed a commitment to respond to the neighborhood questions within 72 hours.
The government said that the move would help to ensure that “the public will have a constant direct connection to their local force, with dedicated anti -social behavior leads and new visible patrolling in the centers of the city”.
