BREAKING: Top Trump Officials (Miller, Noem, Rubio, Hegseth) Are Moving To Military Bases Due To “Safety Threats”!

Web Desk,

Add thelocalreport.in As A Trusted Source

Heads up folks!

It looks like something major is coming….

Big hap tip to my friend MJTruth for being one of the first to catch this:

A storm is coming….

🚨BREAKING – Top Trump Officials are moving to Military Bases due to “Safety Threats”

🔻 Stephen Miller, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—have relocated to secure on-base housing at Washington-area military sites like Fort McNair and Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling.

🔻 Why? Political violence, and targeted threats against administration figures.

This makes sense as Military operations unfold… President Trump via the Pentagon has ordered the National Guard to create “quick reaction” forces in every state and territory by January. And Military Bases offer robust military protection, turning them into de facto safe havens during domestic unrest.

Trust in your President.

The next several months are going to be LIT 🔥

Here’s a quick summary of some of the main points here:

  • Several senior Trump-era officials — including Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, and Marco Rubio — have reportedly moved into housing on U.S. military bases in the Washington, D.C., area, normally reserved for senior military officers.

  • These relocations are motivated by safety concerns, including credible threats and protests directed at former officials.

  • Kristi Noem is said to be living rent-free in a residence typically reserved for the U.S. Coast Guard Commandant at a D.C. military base.

  • Critics argue the home was meant for a military officer, not a civilian appointee, and question whether the arrangement followed proper authorization procedures.

  • The moves have raised concerns about blurring the line between civilian political leadership and military infrastructure.

  • Reports suggest some officials pay rent while others do not, and the documentation of terms has been inconsistent or unclear.

  • The trend is believed to strain limited housing availability for active-duty officers and their families.

  • Supporters defend the moves as a reasonable security measure, ensuring the safety of officials amid increased political hostility.

  • The situation has sparked debate over fairness, transparency, and government accountability regarding civilian use of military housing.

  • Overall, the story reflects a balance between heightened security needs and questions about appropriate resource allocation within the federal system.

The main story seems to have come first from The Atlantic, which I am extremely skeptical of — but it was also just confirmed by The Independent:

Top members of Donald Trump’s White House are reportedly living in homes typically reserved for top military brass in Washington, D.C. as they pull back from neighborhoods where their presences were often targeted for protests by the many Democrats who make the Capital region their homes.

Stephen Miller and Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently joined a growing list of Trump Cabinet secretaries and advisers who’ve chosen to live in reserved military housing, with Rubio moving onto “Generals Row” in Fort McNair and Miller also living in the area after abandoning his digs in Arlington, The Atlantic reported.

They join Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who moved into military housing earlier this year, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is alone among his compatriots in finding some precedent for his decision to move onto Generals Row alongside Rubio.

White House and administration officials gave security concerns as the reasons for the arrangements; one other senior White House official, whose identity was not named by The Atlantic, is also in a similar arrangement due to “security concerns related to a specific foreign threat,” said officials.

While legal, the arrangements put a strain on the short supply of such housing in the District of Columbia and could ruffle some feathers among the nation’s top commanders at a time when relations between political appointees and the brass is already strained. Hegseth is largely to thank for that division after he summoned commanders to Virginia for a speech about “warrior ethos” and aesthetics that was reportedly not well-received.

The practice of putting White House officials in such housing is very new. During the Obama era, Robert Gates made headlines when he became the first Cabinet-level official to choose such an arrangement, and at the time Gates (then Secretary of Defense) was required to pay expensive rent to maintain the location: more than $6,500 per month in 2008 rent levels. That would be nearly $10,000 a month today, factoring in inflation. That year, Congress passed a law to help Gates out, and in doing so paved the road for other Cabinet secretaries to join him.

It’s unlikely that any of the officials named in the piece are on the hook for rents quite that high. Noem, according to The Washington Post, wasn’t paying rent at all when her situation was first reported in August; at the time, a DHS spokeswoman claimed that the secretary had been “doxxed,” requiring such security measures — though it isn’t clear what information about Noem would not have been public already, and law enforcement has not identified any credible violent threats against her. In April, she had her handbag stolen while at a D.C. restaurant.

But is there more to the story?

Something bigger going on?

I think so.

I think it’s pretty plain as day if you’re paying attention.

In related news, we also have this:

Folks, the Trump Administration is preparing for something BIG!

ALSO READ  Do You Own Crypto? Purchase "Kidnapping Insurance" -- Or Use Caleb & Brown?

Something that will create (temporary) big unrest in major cities.

More here:

See that last bullet point?

I’ve been telling you for months….

It’s coming and it’s very close:

WATCH: President Trump REVEALS When He Will Invoke The “Insurrection Act”

I keep telling you, the Insurrection Act IS coming soon…

But when?

And under what circumstances?

President Trump finally just told us.

Watch here:

TRANSCRIPT:

Interviewer: over a weekend. And on what conditions would Mr.— And on a national level, Mr. President— What? The Insurrection Act, under what conditions or terms would you do it?

President: Well, I’d do it if it was necessary.

So far it hasn’t been necessary, but we have an Insurrection Act for a reason.

If I had to enact it, I’d — I’d do that.

If people were being killed and, uh, courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that.

I mean, I want to make sure the people aren’t killed.

We have to make sure that our cities are safe.

RELATED REPORT:

WATCH: President Trump Is Telling You The Insurrection Act Is Coming!

President Trump is telling you about as clearly as he can that invoking the Insurrection Act is coming soon!

Notice how every time he talks about the ANTIFA thugs in Portland he constantly refers to them as “Insurrectionists”…

He is building a case and getting that word and concept out into the public square so people are not caught off guard when he invokes the Insurrection Act.

After all, if people hear about “Insurrectionists” destroying our great cities for month after month, and then President Trump finally steps in to take action and clean things up by invoking the “Insurrection Act” it will make a lot of sense.

Watch this short clip from just this morning:

I’m not the only one picking up on this…

Check out what BioClandestine also posted today:

RELATED REPORT:

UPDATE: President Trump and Invoking The Insurrection Act

I think many of you are connecting the dots extremely well right now, but for anyone wondering “what is happening” I want to fill in the gaps.

Because I think it’s pretty clear exactly where we are going.

With the indictment of James Comey, raid and likely future indictment of John Bolton, and likely a lot more to follow, plus the deployment of troops to major blue cities across America, it seems fairly obvious that something BIG is coming.

And all credit to BioClandestine who I think put forth some excellent analysis and explanation on where we are going.

Trump’s plan is genius.

POTUS technically does not need to invoke the Insurrection Act to send US Military to defend federal property, it’s considered a federal function, NOT local policing.

So Trump can move troops to ICE facilities, have forces in place preemptively, then if he chooses to invoke the Insurrection Act, troops will already be in position, on standby.

The Insurrection Act would be needed if US MIL were to be engaged in riot control, general law enforcement, or quelling rebellion not on federal property.

Trump is putting himself in position so that if he does choose to invoke the Insurrection Act, he already has troops in place at areas of need, and can flip the switch at any moment from defense to offense.

My guess is that the decision is already made. Trump is getting his ducks in a row before he strikes, which is generally his modus operandi.

Battles are won before they begin.

And part 2:

For argument’s sake, let’s assume Trump and his administration end up following through with high-profile arrests of Deep State actors for treason/sedition.

There is a high probability that there would be some form of public backlash. The MSM will make their sheep riot.

Wouldn’t it make sense to have some sort of standing deterrent on-hand to deal with any uprisings or rebellion? Wouldn’t it be necessary to have security in place BEFORE any high-profile arrests can be made?

Food for thought as Trump begins to move US MIL troops to cities nationwide while high-profile actors like Comey are beginning to be indicted.

Some stars are aligning if you watch the moves on the chess board. Trump is setting the stage to save the Republic.

Makes perfect sense, doesn’t it?

ALSO READ  The Big, Beautiful Bill EXPLAINED...and Why Thomas Massie Is Dead Wrong | WLT Report

More confirmation here:

INSURRECTION ACT: President Trump Just Told You What’s Coming Next

President Trump just posted this to TruthSocial:

FULL TEXT:

The Federal Government, under my auspices as President of the United States of America, has stepped into the complete criminal mess that was Washington, D.C., our Nation’s Capital. Because of this, D.C. has gone from one of the most dangerous and murder ridden cities in the U.S.A., and even around the World, to one of the safest – In just a few weeks. The “place” is absolutely booming, with restaurants, stores, and businesses packed and, for the first time in decades, virtually NO CRIME. It has been a beautiful thing to watch but, now, under pressure from the Radical Left Democrats, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who has presided over this violent criminal takeover of our Capital for years, has informed the Federal Government that the Metropolitan Police Department will no longer cooperate with ICE in removing and relocating dangerous illegal aliens. If I allowed this to happen, CRIME would come roaring back. To the people and businesses of Washington, D.C., DON’T WORRY, I AM WITH YOU, AND WON’T ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. I’ll call a National Emergency, and Federalize, if necessary!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!! President DJT

Ok so what does it all mean?

Very simply, he is putting all 50 states on notice that one way or another he is going to clean up the cesspools of crime and violence in this country.

The Mayors and Governors can either work together with him or he will do it himself — through the Insurrection Act.

This was already in play, but after the Charlie Kirk assassination I believe all restraints are off and our President has very little patience left.

WarClandestine agrees:

If you’ve been around here for a while, you know I’ve been telling you this was coming:

CHICAGO IS NEXT: President Trump About To Invoke The Insurrection Act?

In less than two weeks, President Trump has nearly entirely cleaned up Washington, DC.

And I keep telling you he’s getting ready to roll out that model to about 20 other major US cities.

In fact, I wrote about it pretty extensively right here:

Trump is Setting the Stage…

As usual, our reporting is spot on and President Trump himself basically just told you again that he is going to Chicago next.

He just posted this to TruthSocial today:

But….how would that work?

And would it be legal?

Yes, there is a legal framework for doing it.  It’s rarely used, but a good case can be made that it fits here.

I actually told you about it a few months ago right here:

REPORTS: President Trump Is Planning To Invoke The Insurrection Act!

Ok, buckle up folks because I’ve got a LOT to unpack here….

A lot of rumors are flying about what President Trump will or won’t do soon, and most of it centers around rumors that he will soon invoke these 18th century Presidential Powers like the “Wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1978” or the “Insurrection Act of 1807”.

We covered the first one earlier today:

President Trump Will Invoke Wartime Alien Enemies Act Of 1798

Now I want to dig into the other one, because they are, in fact, two totally different things, but rumors are flying about both and I’m seeing a lot of people conflating the two.

Here’s a quick summary:

Alien Enemies Act of 1798

  • Enacted: Part of the Alien and Sedition Acts, signed into law on July 6, 1798, by President John Adams.

  • Purpose: Allows the President to apprehend, restrain, and deport “alien enemies” (non-citizens from a country the U.S. is at war with) during a declared war.

  • Key Features: It applies only in wartime, targeting foreign nationals deemed a threat to national security. It does not involve military deployment domestically against U.S. citizens.

  • Current Status: Still technically in effect (codified in 50 U.S.C. § 21-24), though rarely used. It was notably invoked during World War I and World War II (e.g., internment of Japanese, German, and Italian nationals).

Insurrection Act

  • Enacted: Originally passed in 1807, with significant amendments over time (e.g., 1871 during Reconstruction).

  • Purpose: Authorizes the President to deploy federal military forces or federalize state militias within the U.S. to suppress insurrections, rebellions, or domestic violence when local authorities cannot maintain order.

  • Key Features: Focuses on domestic unrest, not foreign nationals. It can be used in peacetime or wartime and involves military action against U.S. citizens or residents if necessary.

  • Current Status: Codified in 10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255, it remains in effect and has been invoked in cases like the 1992 Los Angeles riots.

Key Differences

  1. Scope: The Alien Enemies Act targets foreign nationals during wartime; the Insurrection Act addresses domestic unrest, regardless of citizenship.

  2. Military Use: The Insurrection Act explicitly involves military intervention, while the Alien Enemies Act focuses on detention and deportation without necessarily requiring military force.

  3. Trigger: The Alien Enemies Act requires a declared war; the Insurrection Act can be triggered by civil disorder or rebellion, even absent a formal war.

Rumors have swirled since the “Summer of Love” in 2020 that President Trump would invoke the Insurrection Act:

And quite frankly?  I think he should have during all the BLM and ANTIFA chaos.

ALSO READ  New: Blussky banned JD Vance only a few minutes after joining the stage. WLT Report

That’s exactly what it was made for.

But President Trump exercised extreme restraint and did not use it.

That’s our first clue as to whether or not President Trump might use it now in 2025….if he didn’t use it when BLM and ANTIFA were burning down major US Cities, is it likely he will use it now?  It could surely happen, but let’s just say I’m not fully convinced.

But Liberals are melting down:

So why is this coming up now?

Because of an Executive Order signed by President Trump on his first day in office back on January 20th titled: “DECLARING A NATIONAL EMERGENCY AT THE SOUTHERN BORDER OF THE UNITED STATES”.

In that Executive Order was this paragraph:

(b) Within 90 days of the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a joint report to the President about the conditions at the southern border of the United States and any recommendations regarding additional actions that may be necessary to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807.

So to be fair, the Democrats aren’t freaking out for no reason….it turns out they actually read the Executive Order — or at least one person did and then it started going viral.

And that 90 day period is up on April 20th, but that’s just the deadline — it could happen earlier.  In fact, the report could already be on President Trump’s desk, we don’t know for sure.

Fox News had more analysis:

On his first day back in office, the president signed a litany of executive orders, including one declaring a state of emergency at the southern border.

According to the order, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security have 90 days to submit a report about the conditions at the border and any recommended actions that need to be taken to secure, “including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807.”

Here’s what the act is, and what it could mean if invoked:

What is the Insurrection Act of 1807?

Dig deeper:

The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails requires the president to request that the participants disperse.

Congress passed the act in 1792, just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice, told The Associated Press it’s an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s, a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement.

“It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn’t exist anymore,” he added.

It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes.

VP Vance Delivers Remarks at U.S.-Mexico Border

Vice President JD Vance toured the U.S.-Mexico border Wednesday, meeting with law enforcement to highlight immigration policies that the White House says have led to fewer arrests since Trump’s second term. Accompanied by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard, Vance is among the highest-ranking Republicans to visit the border. After a helicopter tour of Eagle Pass, they visited a Border Patrol facility and joined a roundtable discussion.

Past use of the Insurrection Act

The backstory:

Presidents have issued a total of 40 proclamations invoking the law, some of those done multiple times for the same crisis, Nunn said. Lyndon Johnson invoked it three times — in Baltimore, Chicago and Washington — in response to the unrest in cities after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968.

During the Civil Rights era, Presidents Johnson, John F. Kennedy and Dwight Eisenhower used the law to protect activists and students desegregating schools. Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, to protect Black students integrating Central High School after that state’s governor activated the National Guard to keep the students out.

George H.W. Bush was the last president to use the Insurrection Act, a response to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of the white police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King in an incident that was videotaped.

Could Trump invoke the Insurrection Act?

Almost anything and everything is on the table during a Trump presidency.

Big picture view:

He’s already fired top Pentagon officials and military lawyers, leading some critics to say the firings are an ominous sign, given that Trump has long made clear his desire to involve the military in his domestic policy goals, including his crackdown on immigration.

In Congress, which has the power to restrict the use of military force through funding and other authorizations, Republicans are largely on board with Trump’s plans.

United States