Liberal Heads will explode at all and can never recover when this happens, so the Supreme Court has been given the opportunity to turn the same-linga marriage at the federal level.
I am not saying that this is “possibility”, but this is possible and it can definitely happen given the current composition of the court.
New: Supreme Court formally asked to reverse the uniform sex governance-ABC
– Insider paper (@Theinsiderpaper) August 11, 2025
Here is a quick history lesson …
US Supreme Court legalized nationwide equal-linga marriage Oborgafel V. Hosquesdecided on 26 June 2015,
One in 5-4 decisionsCourt ruled 14th amendment All states require:
Justice Anthony Kennedy Wrote majority opinions, and the ruling made gay marriage legally legal across the United States.
Now after 10 years, all this can be undone:
Ten years after the Supreme Court extended marriage rights for nationwide equal-lingo couples, this decline first considered the decline that would raise a case that clearly asks them to reverse the decision.
Read more: https://t.co/rhgsbedhgc pic.twitter.com/383Fy491sw
– ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) August 11, 2025
Here is a quick summary what is at stake:
Kim davisAppealing to a former Kentki County Clerk, US Supreme Court To rethink and potentially overturn the landmark 2015 Oburgafael V. Hosques The ruling that legalizes the nationwide equal-linga marriage. His legal team argues that the ruling negatively affects him Religious freedom As a public officer.
It marks First formal request This was decided since the Supreme Court challenged Oburgafael.
Davis face Court decision He needs to pay almost $ 360,000 Refused to serve the couple at compensation and lawyer’s fees; She says that her refusal was a practice for her First amendment right,
His lawyers depicted Oborgafael’s decision “Very wrong” And it is said that this applies to constitutional security Religious belief,
Some? Conservative judicialInvolved Clarence thomas And Samuel AltoThe first dissatisfaction suggested that the obefel decision rethinks the warrant.
many State assembliesInvolved IdahoThe Supreme Court has passed or introduced a resolution to see the decision of equality of marriage.
Despite these developments, most Legal expert And Lower courts Look at Davis’s appeal as the possibility of successful, given that examples and pre -rule have maintained marriage equality strongly.
public opinion Supports equal-sex marriage with national approval 60% in 2015 About this 70% in 2025Although support between Republican There has been a decline in recent years.
For more intensive analysis, here is ABC News,
Ten years after the Supreme Court extended marriage rights for nationwide equal-lingo couples, this decline first considered the decline that would raise a case that clearly asks them to reverse the decision.
Kim Davis, former Kentki County Clerk, who was in jail for six days in 2015, is appealing to $ 260,000 with a $ 100,000 jury’s decision for emotional damage for lawyers, after refusing to issue a wedding license to a gay couple on religious grounds.
In a petition for the writ of certificate filed last month, Davis argues that the first amendment protection for the first amendment protection vaccinations him with personal liabilities to refuse a marriage license.
More fundamentally, she claims the High Court’s decision in Oborgafael V Hoges-The fixed process of the 14th amendment under the security security-the expansion of marriage rights for the same-sex couples-“was very wrong.”
“The mistake should be corrected,” wrote in the petition by Davis’s Attorney Matthew Stave. He says the opinion of the majority of Justice Anthony Kennedy in the Oborgafale “Legal Story”.
The petition marks for the first time since 2015 that the court has been formally asked to turn the landmark marriage decision. Davis is only seen as one of the Americans, which is currently with a legal status to challenge the example.
“If ever there was a case of extraordinary importance,” Stawaw wrote, “The first person in the history of the Republic who went to jail to follow his religious beliefs about the historical definition of marriage should be.”
The lower courts have rejected Davis’s claims and most legal experts have considered their bid a long shot. A federal appeal court panel concluded earlier this year that the former clerk “could not increase the first amendment as a defense because it is being held responsible for state action, which does not protect the first amendment.”
Davis, as the Rowan County Clerk in 2015, was the only right to issue a marriage license from the government under the State Act.
David Armold and David Moore’s Attorney said, “A single judge in the US Court of Appeals did not show any interest in Davis’s rehearsing petition, and we are confident that the Supreme Court will agree that Davis’s arguments do not pay any further attention.”
