In the 6-3 judgment, the Supreme Court has given President Trump its biggest victory so far-a true game-changing for his second term (and for this nation).
Writing for the court, Amy Koni Barrett said that universal nationwide prohibitory orders issued by the evil judges are unconstitutional and illegal:
The Supreme Court reduced the ridiculous process of a huge raling, nationwide prohibitory verification. Under our system, everyone must follow the law – to include judges! pic.twitter.com/S3OS7RPV6F
– JD Vance (@jdvance) 27 June, 2025
I have to disagree with my President at one point … It does not go far away to call it a huge victory. It is actually playing for the rest of his presidential post !!!
It speeds up a lot and frees President Trump to implement his agenda on every issue.
Some random Obama/Soros District from Timbaktu issues a verdict on the day of judge of the court that stops President Trump!
🚨 Breaking: The Supreme Court only put a brake on the activist judges blocking the national policy with “universal prohibition”.
In the 6-3 judgment written by Justice Amy Kony Barrett, Scots said that the federal courts are issuing nationwide ruler for those who are not … pic.twitter.com/ofggfmnkyr
– Hank â„¢ (@hankonx) 27 June, 2025
Here is a quick summary of all major details:
Big victory for Trump administration: The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that there is a possibility of less federal courts More than their constitutional rights By releasing Nationwide prohibition – A major victory for President Trump and his executive powers.
Limit: Justice Amy Kony Barrett, Writing for Orthodox Majority, said that federal courts are meant to settle personal disputes, Not overseeing the entire executive branch Or block the federal policies.
Impact on Trump’s Executive Order: The case arose from the executive order of President Trump, which eliminates birth appreciative for children of non-citizens on short-term visas or without legal status. The lower courts had blocked the nationwide order – the Supreme Court said that it went far away.
Nationwide prohibition is not historically grounded: The court ruled that such a comprehensive prohibition was not considered Judiciary of 1789 And there is a lack of any historical basis.
Prohibition should be narrow: The courts can give relief to the real plaintiff only in a lawsuit, unless the case is formally certified as a class action – to tighten the scope of judicial measures against the federal policy.
Constitutionalism of Trump’s order uninterrupted: Important thing, court Did not rule Is Trump’s birthright order constitutional. Was strict about the ruling judicial authority And the proper scope of prohibition.
Liberal justice firm dissatisfaction: Justice Sotomore, Kagan and Jackson dissatisfaction. Jackson warned that the ruling government allows the constitutional rights to violate until every affected individual suit.
Justice Barrett revolted for dissatisfaction: In a rare step, Barrett criticized the dissatisfaction of judicial Jackson directly, criticizing a “royal executive” and accused of seeking a “royal judiciary”.
The ruling opens some doors: The court opened the possibility that State governments Still may be able to get widespread relief-to allow for the case-by-case discretion whether nationwide measures are required.
Future implications: This decision will limit the increasing trend of single federal judges to prevent nationwide Presidential works, forcing the challenges to be more targeted and possibly slow.
Attorney General praised governance: US Attorney General Palm Bondi appreciated the verdict, stating that it ends the “endless” judicial blockade of Trump’s policies and confirms the President’s right.
Here was the best part:
Here is more live than Fox News:
Breaking: Scots only ruled that the nationwide prohibition by the worker judges is likely to exceed their rights.
Large -scale victory
This should help stop judicial activism in an attempt to stop Trump’s agenda pic.twitter.com/qfkdxsl4uk
– Libs of Tultok (@Libsoftiktok) 27 June, 2025
While not directly the issue of the case, it also opens the door for President Trump to eliminate congenital citizenship.
At least, it returns its executive order to the table for now, with the prohibition of the lower court now the verdict is pronounced as illegal and unconstitutional:
In the bus: Are President Trump’s executive order officially ending birthright in influence.
– Comment (@ReMarks) 27 June, 2025
This does not mean that the issue is still not on the table and almost certainly the verdict will eventually be pronounced directly from the Supreme Court, but now it removes the prohibition of the lower court which stopped the executive order.
Who else is dancing with me right now?
