Earlier we were told that Epstein gel video was not edited in any way, besides making it easy to clean and make it easy.
Then we were told that one-minute was missing, but there is an explanation for now.
Now today experts have investigated the video and found that more footage is missing compared to trust in the beginning – about 3 minutes of footage is now considered missing.
You are joking:
Comes from report Wire And here is a summary that he just told:
DOJ released ~ 11 hours of monitoring footage From outside Epstein’s cell to address rumors about his death.
The footage was labeled “Raw,” But metadata suggests that it was edited using Adobe Premier Pro. It was stitched with at least two clips and rescued several times.
About 3 minutes A clip was cut off-about 2 minutes and 53 seconds-the courage from 11:58:58 am to 12:00 pm on a minute’s jump.
Attorney General Palm Bondi explained The gel night recording system reset a minute interval, saying that it is daily.
Video anomalies include Aspect ratio and changing the metadata timestamp, questioning the series of custody – even if no one is intentionally proved wrong.
Expert care Editing may be regular – for example, converting proprietary formats into MP4 – but warned that forensic metadata should be fully explained to clarity.
Maga-fasting voices, Dan, including Dan Bongino and others, has been criticized for more transparency criticizing DOJ/FBI to say “Raw”.
Doj/FBI confirmed him 2019 suicide conclusionStating that there is no evidence of the client list or foul play.
Full article here: https://www.wird.com/story/the-fbis-Jeffrey- Epstein-prison- prison- prison-s
What do you think?
Do you think Epstein is alive or dead?
National Poll: Do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein is alive or dead?
Related report:
Doj finally releases a full video of 11-hour outside Epstein’s cell-but a full minute is missing!
Matadata suggests that FBI’s Jeffrey Epstein Gel Video was edited with Adobe Premier Pro – two source videos put together
It keeps getting bad and worse for only Palm Bondi and DOJ …
We have previously discussed all the methods in which the Jeffrey Epstein Gel Videos that it released was beyond the measurement, but now more news comes that the video was almost certainly modified and edited – with – Adobe Premier Pro:
Not only this, but reports are also emerging that editing involves at least two different sources video together:
New: Metadata was possibly amended from ‘Raw’ Jeffrey Epstein Gel Video, “according to a new report by Wired.
The outlet says he analyzed the 10-hour gel video with “independent video forensic experts”, which modified the “raw” footage.
The outlet emphasized that at the moment, there is no evidence that the footage was somehow manipulated “misleading”, but says it was somewhat modified.
“Instead of direct export from the prison monitoring system, the footage was modified, possibly using the professional editing tool Adobe Premier Pro,” Wired found.
“The file appears to be assembled from at least two source clips, saved several times, exported, and then uploaded on the DOJ website, where it was presented as ‘Raw’ footage.”
“Experts warned that it was not clear what was actually changed, and that metadata does not prove misleading manipulation.”
The development comes as Deputy Director of FBI Dan Bongino, it took day after a confrontation with AG Palm Bondi to allegedly deal with the footage of the prison.
The editing of the video should not be completely surprising as DOJ told us from the beginning that they were increasing the video to make it easier to watch.
Per HillHe also released a original version and a great version:
But after the release of the video about the Timstamp, more doubts came out, which jumps ahead in a minute at midnight on 10 August. Jump is worth noting In original video And A great version From FBI.
So that part is not amazing.
The amazing part is sewing two separate video sources simultaneously. It does not feel right and it does not feel good.
The news of editing was broken for the first time Wired:
Here is a quick summary of the major points made in that article:
DOJ released about 11 hours of monitoring footage Before his death from outside the cell of Jeffrey Epstein, it was labeled as “full raw” footage.
Matadata suggests that the footage was editedAdobe Premier Pro is likely to use, suggesting that it was assembled from several clips and saved several times.
Experts say there is no evidence of deceptionBut editing indicates that the video was not completely untouched, possibly improved for public release.
A ‘minute interval The footage exists (from 11:58:58 am to 12:00:00); Doj gives it to one Regular system reset It happens at night.
Technical issues noted Include changes in aspect ratio and compression artifacts, leading experts suspect that the footage will be acceptable as raw evidence in the court.
However, the timeline appears beyond the difference, Video labeling has been criticized as “Raw” Misleading Raise public skepticism,
Maintain DOJ and FBI The footage supports the official conclusion: Epstein died of suicide And no unauthorized person could reach his cell tier.
Critics argue that editing should have been revealedTransparency is more doubted as fuel deficiency.
Attorney General Palm BondiAppointed under Trump Administration, defending the release of Doj and said that The difference was purely technical More videos Supports established story,
What is your take on that?