On Friday, the Supreme Court handed over President Trump the biggest victory of its entire time in the office.
And I am still so excited about it that I can barely contain myself – this is a huge gamechanger.
If you miss it then details here:
But in all enthusiasm in that case, you must have missed another big who is not paying almost adequate attention.
The supermace has been on a roll, this one has a big disadvantage for employed paternity:
Breaking: The Supreme Court’s decision 6-3 ban planned paternity by receiving Medicid Taxpayer Dollar, Fox Report. pic.twitter.com/csmaj5hdwi
– Oppose mainstream (@resistheles) 26 June, 2025
Here are all details that you need to know:
The US Supreme Court decided 6-3 that state can stop the employed paternity from obtaining a medicade fund by restricting the ability to sue the patients.
The case originated from the 2018 executive order of Henry McMaster, Governor of South Carolina, which removes the employed paternity from the state’s Medicade program.
The court found that the “any qualified provider” segment of the Medicade has not empowered individual patients to challenge state’s decisions in the court.
Decision emphasizes that the providers offering abortion services have been asked to withdraw medicated funding, even though services are being reimbursed, unrelated to abortion.
The federal law still prevents the medicade from the financing of abortion except limited cases, but it envisions the rights of the ruling states that protect the providers who introduce them.
Planned paternity offers a wide range of services beyond abortion, including cancer screening, birth control, and STI remedies, which can now be affected.
Justice Neil Golsuch wrote a majority opinion, in which the border was emphasized on judicial intervention in the decisions of the State Medicade provider.
Justice Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson warning the ruling, reduced the access to the patient’s choice and healthcare.
Eighteen state Attorney General supported South Carolina, indicating that other states may now attempt to exclude similar medicade.
The ruling state and federal action reflects long -running conservative efforts, including those supported by President Trump, to discredit employed paternity through federal action.