Police is hung for anti -empire protest After judges In one, the ban on housing shelter fans canceled Eating hotel plagued by disturbance.
Court of appeal judges ruled Closing the Bell Hotel in the approach, Essex will have a “clear result” on the government’s duty for shelter seekers and will have Other councils “encourage” If permission is given then take similar legal action.
Epping Forest District Council (EFDC) sought prohibition against the use of hotel for migrants thereafter Series of violent protest On the site, the arrest of a resident on alleged sexual offenses jumped.
But in a certain victory for the home office on Friday, the appeal court found that the High Court Judge Mr. Justice Ire prohibited when he gave prohibition, which would have been seen by all the 138 shelters removed by 12 September.
The Essex was the officer posted in the hotel after giving the decision and it is believed that there was an important policing plan to the ruling sparks and in terms of unrest. Meanwhile, Arman Maithison, assistant chief constable of Glostershair Police, said the force was “well prepared” for rallies in its area.
The anti-racism counter-protesters were preparing to raise against the planned migrant rallies at 23 places across the UK in the weekend.
Demonstrations are planned for Cheshnt, Bornmouth and Chichster on Friday evening, as well as in Cardiff, Oldam, Nottingham, Partsmouth, Glusters, Canary Ghat and Croly on Saturday and Sunday.

The EFDC leader, Chris Whitbred, called for calm down after the ruling and said: “There have been peaceful protests and non-proclaimed protests have taken place outside the hotel. You saw that as part of our case, but I just ask the residents to calm down.” He said that he was “really worried for the future of the city”.
The council vowed to continue its legal battle, in which the final prohibition to be held in October was heard. It urged the government that “take responsibility for the incidents in Eating in the last six weeks”.
Home Office Minister Dame Angela Eagle MP said that the ministers had demanded an appeal for prohibition to “get out in a controlled and systematic manner”. But Chhaya’s home secretary Chris Filp accused Labor of “using courts against the British public”.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch asked the Conservative Council to continue the search for equal prohibition against hotels in their areas, many already confirm that they will take legal action.
Nigel Faraj of the reform responded to the news, saying that “illegal migrants have more rights than British people under a starrer”.
The Home Secretary had argued in the appeal court that the episted hotel prohibition should not stand as it would disrupt its legal duty to those who seek unsafe refuge who would be otherwise disappointing.

In written arguments, the Home Office stated that “relevant public interests in sports are not the same”, trying to be contrary to disruption of epping with widespread impact for the government seekers by the government.
In his judgment, Lord Justice Bean, Lady Justice Nicola Davis and Lord Justice Cob said that this comparison was “” “unattractive” about “a hierarchy of rights”.
However, he agreed that the High Court Judge Mr. Justice Ire has failed to consider “the important practical challenge to transfer a large number of shelters in a short time”.
Somani Hotels Limited, who is the owner of the Bell Hotel, stated that it was “caught in the midst of a very widespread debate on the treatment of asylum seekers” and asked “All the alone lonely associated with the Bel Hotel are left alone to continue to support the government’s shelter plans”.
For EFDC, Tory Counselor Shane Yellell said that the government should “hang its head in shame”.
Demanding to lift the ban, the house office lawyers said that maintaining prohibitory orders would lead to more risk of disorder. The Home Office stated that “available refuge property is unreliablely subject to high level demand”, and that the loss of 152 bed space on closing the Eating hotel will give rise to “quite difficulties”.
Staffordshire County Council, which has threatened to take similar legal action on the use of hotels for the first house shelter seekers, stated that Friday’s decisions “our county and disregard the impact on communities and services across the country”.

The latest home office data shows that by the end of June, 32,059 asylum seems to be in the UK hotels.
It was above 29,585 at the same point a year ago, when the conservatives were still in power, but were slightly below 32,345 figures at the end of March.
Appeal by hotel owners and home office comes in the same week as a resident in the hotel, Hadush Garbarslasi Kebatu has been on trial Last month, a 14 -year -old girl was accused of sexually assaulting.

Mr. Kebatu, who denies the allegations, told a court on Wednesday that he did not attempt to kiss the girl as she was a “not a wild animal”. He told the court of the Colchester Magistrate that he called only schoolgirls and his friends “hello” in epping, Essex, and nothing more than because he was “worried about my refuge case”.
Another person who was living on the site, the Syrian national Mohammad Sharmarka has been accused of seven different crimes, while the alleged disorder outside the hotel has been accused on several others.
The police have arrested 25 people in connection with the disorder in protests at the Eating Hotel, alleging 16 criminal offenses.
The applied Forest District Council will have another opportunity to challenge the use of Bell Hotel for shelter seekers in a full hearing listed in mid -October.