Add thelocalreport.in As A Trusted Source
In news Bound to thrill and horrify straight men Everywhere, one can now assess one’s potential as a romantic partner by taking the boyfriend test. At least, that’s a team theory Oakland University researchers, who analyzed 202 heterosexual men who have been in relationships for at least six months and found that people with better problem-solving skills and the ability to recognize patterns tend to be steadier and more reliable partners. In other words, the idiots did the best.
The study’s authors, led by data analyst and social scientist Gavin Vance, found that men They studied that those who had a very specific type of intelligence – the ability to recognize patterns in sequences of numbers and letters – were less likely to take risks outside the relationship, and therefore were more likely to remain faithful to their partner. In addition to displaying fewer signs of psychopathic traits, they were also less likely to display jealousy, exhibit controlling behavior, or insult their partner.
It goes against everything women are attracted to: thinking about bad boys with a tendency to write torturous poetry in their Notes app, wearing old leather jackets, and being emotionally unavailable. In other words, the sad souls that pop culture has always cast as lustful lotharios. he is gossip GirlChuck Bass. ocRyan atwood. the Vampire Diaries‘Damon Salvatore. And so on. Rarely are math whizzes at the top of their class recognized as good lovers, but science views differ.
Whether we are ready for the lesson or not is debatable. The hot mess bad boy appeal continues. Just last month a study was published Journal of Research in Personality It was found that the nicer the boy, the less likely he was to find a romantic partner.
After analyzing data from 3,780 adults in Australia, Denmark and Sweden, the study found that neuroticism and agreeableness had a negative relationship in men. Meanwhile, men who were outgoing, confident, and outgoing were significantly more likely to be in a relationship than those who were more introverted. For women, the opposite was true. “An assertive, extroverted man may receive a positive response when approaching potential partners, while an assertive woman may face indecision or negativity,” said study co-author Philip Force Connolly, associate professor of sociology and psychology at Umea University in Sweden.
And so heterosexual women have a problem: We’re more likely to shy away from cool geeks with steady heads on their shoulders, even though they’re probably going to be the best partners. How to deal with it?
Don’t worry, there is an app for that, or there probably will be soon. mainly in digital dating With a landscape that is constantly advancing, in which AI is being integrated into most platforms, it is not difficult to imagine a world where good boyfriend and girlfriend tests actually exist. Yes it can be It takes a little bit of everything black Mirror, But matchmaking technology has existed for years and is already being used by apps to help customize our preferences, a process that AI promises to improve. “Where AI is brilliant is that it can learn patterns,” Bumble CEO Whitney Wolfe Hurd said in an interview. the new York Times Published earlier this year. “It can scan hundreds of profiles if not more and say, ‘Hey, I think you should meet this person because they have similar values.’ This is where sorting and machine learning can be really powerful.
The topic of artificially engineered matchmaking to the extent where an algorithm can introduce you to your soulmate is even the subject of a recent movie, You allDirected and co-written by William Bridges, who also wrote for black MirrorStarring Imogen Poots and Brett Goldstein, the film is set in a world in which a company called Soul Connex offers to pair you with your soulmate through the same test, It’s easy to see how ripe this concept is for drama, and how easily the idea of testing can be distorted: can we really find the person we want to be with through a third-party service, no matter how advanced?
We’ll have to wait a few years to see when things like this inevitably enter the dating market. But in the meantime, perhaps heterosexual women could follow the advice of an Oakland University research team to increase their chances of finding lasting love by dating a guy with analytical problem-solving skills rather than a guy who writes bad poetry and dreams of being in a band. A nice egghead if you like.
Of course, this is all based on a relatively small sample size, and Vance’s team emphasizes that the study is correlational and therefore cannot prove cause and effect. But that doesn’t make the idea of the boyfriend test any less appealing, especially when you really think about what really makes a man a keeper. So, with that in mind, here are the five questions I think you should ask your potential competitors for your boyfriend test – take them with a pinch of salt:
- Have you ever ghosted someone, or left them “read” for more than 48 hours? (Permitted in exceptional circumstances, i.e. stolen phone or sudden death)
- How much therapy have you had? (Minimum of five hours required)
- How many ex-partners have you labeled “crazy” instead of analyzing their contribution to the downfall of a relationship? (ideally zero)
- Have you ever written a poem for a woman instead of communicating your feelings clearly? (avoid if so)
- Are you an actor or musician? (The correct answer should be obvious)
Now you know, test and act accordingly. God’s speed.