Add thelocalreport.in As A Trusted Source
traitor And a brilliant, albeit funereal, Claudia Winkleman is back on screens in the UK – and you can ease the tension with a poison-filled dagger.
This time, the mixed-up loyalist and the traitor aren’t civilians – they’re celebrities. The cast is diverse, including actors, comedians, singers, athletes and presenters. Each has its own special expertise, objectives, characters and fan clubs.
They all play for a share of the jackpot for their nominated charity. But how might this new celebrity dynamic affect the state of the game? can do neuroscience And Psychology Predict what kind of mind games, alliances, betrayals and blatant deceit may be employed in the name of completely unforgettable entertainment?
This is going to be another addictive game of smoke and mirrors. No spoilers, I promise!
The prominent status of our celebs means that audiences have preconceived ideas about them. But what matters more within the castle walls are the everyday impressions, even before they split into tribes – as most loyalists whose job it is to catch some hidden traitors.
Skill
Every artist is a celebrity for a reason, and a professional in their field. Actors such as Celia Imrie and Mark Bonner may be skilled at reading the emotions of others, and may have specific advantages in performance.
The ability to pretend to be upset or upset, pretend to be innocent, or lie really convincingly may prove to be a distinctive asset. Especially when research has suggested that how you act or present yourself is a stronger predictor of credibility than the actual truth of your statement.
But acting skills can be seen as concealment, and can prove damaging if cross-examined. Equally, misplaced overreactions or poor acting can also immediately arouse suspicion and doubt.
Athletes like Tom Daly and Joe Marler have strength and agility that allow them to excel in physical challenges. This training can foster trust, or signal a dominance that can highlight them as leaders.
Athletes have also honed their abilities to focus the mind in a competitive situation. They know how to suppress and hide symptoms of anxiety or adrenaline – sweating, shivering, flushing, and so on – which might otherwise appear as obvious symbols of lying.
Watch Apple TV+ for free for 7 days
New customers only. £9.99/month. After the free trial. Plan to automatically renew until canceled.
Advertisement. If you sign up for this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism at The Independent.
Watch Apple TV+ for free for 7 days
New customers only. £9.99/month. After the free trial. Plan to automatically renew until canceled.
Advertisement. If you sign up for this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism at The Independent.
About the author
Dan Baumgardt is Senior Lecturer in the School of Psychology and Neuroscience at the University of Bristol.
This article was first published by The Conversation and is republished under a Creative Commons license. read the original article,
Meanwhile, comedians like Jo Wilkinson and Lucy Beaumont are both charming and reprehensible. We know that deception and humor are interrelated social phenomena. Humor can be used for deception but it can also lighten the atmosphere and defuse tense situations. But ill-timed comedy can also provoke it, or be seen as an attempt to distract.
All of these traits can help characterize someone as untrustworthy or equally Machiavellian. Machiavellianism, which involves acting dishonestly to gain power, is one of the traits of what psychologists call the “Dark Triad.” This could establish them as either pariahs, or potential targets – ripe for assassination or exile.
pre-existing relationships
Many celebs have entered the game already knowing each other. Paloma Faith and Alan Carr are real-life friends. This dimension is not necessarily limited to the celebrity version. In previous series, some relationships were established before entering the palace – mother and son, siblings, and even contestants dating.
With our stars, these former relationships are already out in the open for all to see. As broadcasters, Claire Balding and Kate Garraway share common ground, as do writers such as Stephen Fry and David Olusoga, and singers Charlotte Church and Cat Burns. People playing the game will keep such relationships in mind.
As psychology also tells us, birds of a feather flock together – a concept known as homophily. This can lead to natural alliances and stronger agreements. But it can equally lead to strong feelings of betrayal, if or when they break up.
What about the unknown relatives – Nico Omilana and Ruth Codd – who arrived without anyone knowing? Research shows that our brains make rapid decisions about unfamiliar faces, within milliseconds. Whether or not they can be considered trustworthy depends on independent variables including facial dimensions, age, gender, and personality. Female gender and positive social interactions in particular lead to more favorable judgments.
Fame can also be a problem when it comes to strategy. A contestant from a previous civilian series with an English accent decided to adopt a Welsh burr instead. This was because they considered the Welsh pronunciation more credible.
Star status makes such a strategy impossible. And with details of their work or personal lives potentially in the spotlight, celebrities may find themselves more vulnerable in the game.
play for charity
Also, playing for yourself versus playing for charity really creates another interesting dynamic. You could argue that ultimately no one will lose in this game as the jackpot is undoubtedly going towards a good cause. But it also depends on differences in altruism between individuals.
This difference is evident in the brain itself. research from neuroscience This shows that different brain activity patterns are responsible for driving behavior associated with winning and losing money in a given task. This research also revealed stronger reactions when winning for oneself versus for charity, but this may vary between individuals.
We also need to look at the desire to win for the sake of glory, which is perhaps more evident in athletes and people in business. Public image matters. And that begs the question – how happy are these celebrities taking their risks?
It is noteworthy how this concept traitor It can give us a glimpse into the psyche, enlightened sides of people that we haven’t seen before. Whatever the outcome, this is going to prove to be another interesting psychological experiment. Hope you’ve got your popcorn and (non-poisoned) cup ready.