Charlie Kirk “Protégé” Brilyn Hollyhand EXPOSED Yet AGAIN!

Web Desk,

Add thelocalreport.in As A Trusted Source

ANOTHER Brilyn Hollyhand is going viral.

Why?

Because he just put forth some amazing points in a debate and millions of college students are now flocking to hear him speak and debate?

Ummm, no.

I kind of feel bad piling on this kid because he’s so young and I think, maybe, his heart’s in the right place?

But I also just really hate inauthentic things and people, and this kid is screaming PHONY to me.

I’ve covered him before, but the clips just keep coming…

In other words, he keeps stepping in it so badly that it’s basically a sport now to debate him and watch him implode.

And while I’m not real bullish on Hollyhands, I am super bullish on the young people in these colleges showing up to grab a mic and challenge Hollyhands on his ideas.

Because THAT is the legacy Charlie Kirk left.

Charlie trained them up to question everything and to pursue conservative, Christian values and ideals, and they are doing it in droves, running circles around Hollyhands.

Here’s the latest one…

DISCLAIMER: this article is not anti-Israel or pro-Israel, it’s just the topic that happened to come up in the Q&A.  The students ask Hollyhands about AIPAC and whether he thinks AIPAC should have to register as a foreign agent organization.

Good question, right?

Fair question!

Even the most ardent support of Israel would have to admit that perhaps AIPAC should at least have to register under FARA.  It’s not good or bad, no value judgments, but if you literally are a foreign agent lobbyist organization, shouldn’t you need to follow the law and register?

It’s a great and fair question, but instead of answering it Hollyhands goes off on a weird defense about how he personally has never taken any money from AIPAC or Israel.

Bro, that wasn’t the question!

Methinks thou dost protest too much?

HOLY CRAP DUDE!

Watch here:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

Questioner:
But, um, part one would just be, uh, the American Israeli Political Action Committee, uh, commonly known as AIPAC, has failed to register as a foreign agent in this nation, allowing them to have almost unrestricted access to U.S. politicians and, uh, bribing them essentially to put Israel’s interests first and America’s interests last.

That being said, would you support having AIPAC register as a foreign agent organization, and would you be willing to debate Nick Fuentes on the subject?

Respondent:
I have no affiliation. I’ve never talked to anybody even like closely related to AIPAC. I don’t have anything to do with that. I’ve never taken a dollar of foreign money. I’ve been accused of that on social media.

Everyone in my family can see my bank account and no money has at all come in from any foreign nation at all. So I have nothing to do with AIPAC or anything that they do in this country.

I wish everyone the best of luck and free and fair America, but I’ve got nothing at all to do with that. Nor have I, like, talked to anybody or even publicly supported or opposed AIPAC.

That was just a really easy point for people to attack me on because I was a Christian who supported Israel, and I have no affiliation with AIPAC.

Questioner:
So—so would you support having them register as a foreign agent?

Respondent:
I think if people are misusing the laws, sure. I haven’t looked into that. I have no idea of anything with AIPAC. I go to campuses and ask people to register to vote.

I have nothing to do with AIPAC or anything to do with this country.

Questioner:
Gotcha. And, uh, so kind of that second part question there, uh, with the whole free marketplace of ideas, would you be willing to—to debate Nick Fuentes on that?

Respondent:
We’ll see what happens. I’m a little busy going to college classes every day, and I’m speaking on campuses every afternoon.

Uh, we’ll see what happens later in the semester. He seems like a cool guy. I saw he called me a country bumpkin on Twitter, which I thought was pretty funny.

So, we’ll see what happens.

Backup video here if needed:

And in case you missed it, here was his last implosion:

“Charlie Kirk Replacement” Brilyn Hollyhand EXPOSED — This is Bad!

Was Charlie Kirk just surrounded by snakes at every turn?

ALSO READ  Fermented cabbage: Ancient superfood that cures your intestine and mind). WLT Report

I think Charlie was such an optimist and such a great person that he simply saw the good in everyone — and its beginning to look like he was surrounded by vipers all around him.

I know everyone grieves in their own way, but nothing I’ve seen from Erika has looked even remotely genuine to me.  Sorry, I’m just calling it like I see it.  Maybe she is Esther reincarnate and the best person on the face of the Earth, but everything I’ve seen gives me great pause.

Then you have his lead Executive Producer Andrew Kolvet and that guy is giving me majorly bad vibes.

And now today we go to the so-called “Charlie Kirk Replacement” Brilyn Hollyhand.

This kid was on Fox News an hour after Charlie was killed seemingly auditioning for the role of the “next Charlie Kirk”.

I know he’s young and perhaps his heart is in the right place, so I’m going to try and not be too tough on him, but by no means is this the next Charlie Kirk.

Charlie was authentic at his core.  Authentic and genuinely curious about life and learning and making this country better every single day.

This Brilyn Hollyhand character, in contrast, feels like he was created in a lab in Quantico, VA!

I told everyone one week ago that everything about this kid felt “off” to me:

Meet The New Charlie Kirk!

And now today that gut feeling has been 100% confirmed.

Check out this horrible interaction at a recent college visit where Hollyhands promotes the Far-Left concept of America as a “Melting Pot” and watch as he tells the students that of course we have to accept more mass immigration and of course we can’t close our borders:

TRANSCRIPT:

Interviewer:
So we should, uh, keep increasing the amount of legal immigrants?

Guest:
Legal immigrants, yes. We’re a melting pot — I absolutely support that.

Interviewer:
So, I’m sure you understand these groups vote overwhelmingly against American values. They vote for the Democratic Party. So surely that’s the death of the Republican Party, right?

Guest:
Yes, but we can’t close our borders and have our nation— where we don’t accept anybody to come in.

Interviewer:
Why not? Plenty of countries do that.

Guest:
We can’t just completely close our borders off and never allow somebody else to migrate into the country, though.

Interviewer:
Why not?

Guest:
Because that’s how the country was started. That’s a melting pot. Like, we welcome people in.

Interviewer:
This country did not start as a melting pot. That term was invented in 1910 by Israel Zangwill.

Guest:
So, the people that came over from England didn’t melt into America—

Interviewer:
No.

Guest:
—in the Wild West years?

Interviewer:
They started America. They didn’t melt into anything.

Guest:
Okay. I’ve been very clear that I am against illegal immigration coming into this country and plaguing our generation from not getting jobs, making our streets unsecure, and actually, like, harming Americans’ future. Because therefore, there’s no safe America and free America to grow up in.

Interviewer:
Again, my question wasn’t about illegal immigration. It was about legal immigration.

Guest:
And I think we should support more people coming legally and not illegally.

Interviewer:
Okay.

Guest:
Yes. I think we all understand what you’re—

Backup here if needed:

Sorry kid, but Charlie Kirk would not have agreed with anything that just came out of your mouth.

ALSO READ  WIPED CLEAN? Gary Gensler’s Text Messages "Go missing" For Two Year Period

And to their credit, I think the kids at the microphone pushing Hollyhands about his ideas are the real legacy of Charlie Kirk.

Charlie wanted to change the next generation….free them from the Far-Left indoctrination and teach them to think for themselves.

The fact that these kids kept pressing back against Hollyhands’ Far-Left woke talking points is the real testament to Charlie Kirk’s work!

Charlie is gone, but in his place is an army of critically-thinking students who are pressing back against the “Melting Pot” trope and asking why the United States is the only country not allowed to close its borders and maintain its sovereignty.

WELL DONE STUDENTS!  BRAVO!

Oh, and one more before I go…

Here is Hollyhands being asked if he would debate Nick Fuentes in the spirit of free exchange and debate of ideas and he says “I’m a little busy right now but he seems like a cool guy”.  Oh my goodness….

Speaker:

And, uh, so kind of that second part question there, uh, with, with the whole free marketplace of ideas, would you be willing to, to debate Nick Fuentes on that?

We’ll see what happens.

I’m a little busy going to college classes every day, and I’m speaking on campuses every afternoon.

Uh, we’ll see what happens later this semester.

He seems like a cool guy. I saw he called me a country bumpkin on Twitter, which I thought was pretty funny, so—

we’ll see what happens.

Thank you.

In case you missed it, here was my original report on Mr. Hollyhands (literally could there be a more gay sounding name?):

Meet The New Charlie Kirk!

Ok, I have to apologize a bit for that headline because it is EXTREMELY tongue-in-cheek.

Allow me to explain…

Meet Brilyn Hollyhan, who is very clearly positioning himself as the “new Charlie Kirk”.

The only problem?

Almost no one seems to like him, yours truly included.

Now look, I don’t want to be mean to this kid, he’s a Freshman in College and on the surface he seems to be fighting for conservative ideals, which is great.

The problem (at least to me) is that he just seems wildly inauthentic and fake and saccharine.

The thing we all loved about Charlie, and the thing we all love about Donald Trump, in addition to their views and stances on important issues, is they are wildly authentic people.  Not everyone is going to like them, and they both have huge followings and huge groups of haters.

But they are real — good, bad and ugly.

This kid?

Well, let’s just say I think Clint Russell summed it up perfectly with this post:  “This kid was created in Langley.”

Spot on my man!

ALSO READ  WLT report is a response to President Trump for Kamla Harris re -running in 2028

And let’s just say it’s going even worse for him in the comments:

Here he is bragging about a “SOLD-OUT AUDITORIUM” — except, it just kinda looks like a large classroom and the energy in that room is dead:

It’s literally like AI programmed this kid to have all the right components but zero heart or authenticity and it all just falls very flat.

Stuff like this doesn’t help…

Looking like you just left the Country Club and flying on a private jet to your “SOLD OUT AUDITORIUM” speaking arrangement is not really the way to win over people:

Let’s just say the comments to this one were even worse…

My favorite (and most accurate) one is the guy saying it looks like he was groomed by Joel Osteen.  So spot on!

And what kind of a name is Brilyn Hollyhand?

None of us can choose our names, so I get it — it’s not fair to harp on that too much, but it sounds like a girls name from 2020?

This is our little Brilyn, isn’t she so cute?

Brilyn?

Realy?

And what the hell is a “Hollyhand”?

The whole thing feels really weird and fabricated.

But hey, we can’t all have sweet names like Noah Christopher!

To be fair, Laura Loomer likes him and is sticking up for him:

One polite correction for Laura: I can’t speak for everyone, but I can speak for myself and my objection is not that he “comes from money”.

I don’t even know if that’s true, it could be all big donors.

My objection is the painfully bad lack of authenticity, feeling like this kid was stitched together in a lab and rolled out to the public as if he’s just supposed to be the new Charlie Kirk now.

Sorry, that’s not how this works.

You earn the spot, you don’t just waltz in.

We also hate when we can tell some person or some propaganda is being slammed down our throats, and that’s what this feels like.

This picture illustrates — from obscurity to suddenly the hottest thing ever:

Sorry bud, you may be a nice guy and your heart may be in the right place but to quote that black guy from American Idol: “It’s a no for me dog!”

United States