Add thelocalreport.in As A Trusted Source
New Delhi, October 6 (IANS) condemned the bid to throw an object in the Chief Justice (CJI) BR Gawai in the Supreme Court on Monday, Congress MP Imran Masood called it a “dark day in the history of the country”.
Speaking to IANS, Imran Masood said, “This day will be written in black letters in the history of the country. It is a dark day for India. Throwing a shoe in the Chief Justice of India in the Supreme Court, is it not a work of madness? What kind of hatred is being cultivated in this country?
“Sanatan Dharma is a religion of love, not hatred. The Constitution grants every citizen’s freedom to practice his religion. No one is insulting any belief, but the spread of hatred is dangerous.
Meanwhile, on the first day, CJI Br Gavai allegedly decided that no action would be taken against a person dressed in a lawyer’s rebel-attempted to disrupt the proceedings in the first day during the day-by trying to throw an item on a bench led by CJI Gawai.
Allegedly, the man approached the desses and allegedly tried to remove his shoes, but the security personnel immediately intervened and expelled him out of the court.
While taking away, he was heard shouting slogans referring to Sanatan Dharma.
The proceedings were briefly interrupted, but the CJI remained composed by Gavai and continued without any break.
He said, “Don’t be distracted by all this. We are not distracted. These things do not impress me,” he said.
Later, sources confirmed that CJI Gawai had stated that the matter should be ignored and no further action should be initiated against the person concerned.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association unanimously passed a resolution, allegedly expressed “deep pain and rejection”, allegedly “an inappropriate and intimate gesture”, which was aimed at insulting CJI Gavai-Bench.
Conduct called the “imbalance of a member of the bar”, Skora said that it was hit on the foundation of mutual respect that maintains relations between the bench and the bar.
Sankalp said, “This behavior is contrary to the constitutional values of legal profession’s dignity and decoration, discipline and institutional integrity.”
It states that any attempt to reduce or personalize gestures against the Supreme Court’s sitting judges “makes a direct attack on the independence of the judiciary and reduces public confidence in the judiciary distribution system.”
,
JK/Red