MWhile ixing his metaphors with a terrible self-confidence that some in his party these days, the Kemi Badenoch-Tory leader was about his first speech for his first speech-as fast as: “We have a mountain to climbBut we have a song in our heart, and we are ready for fighting. ,
In fact, he can do all this, to get up on the stage and tell them all that they can all pack and go home. Or reforms to join the UK. He cannot be expected to accept that they are far away Gain power As they have ever been, the public will not be interested in listening to them for a very long time, that Nigel Faraz is running away with the game, and, historically unpopularly as unpopularly as Sir Kir Stmper and their party, they actually lead the Tory.
There are many other people who will declare happily Tory is finishedOr, as Dominic Coming, the destroyer of the world, says that they are “”The incident crossed the horizon“. Ms. Badenoch can be the only person in the conference hall in Manchester, to believe what she was saying and that victory is possible. In that context, her terrible self-confidence can separate her colleagues and change the general public, but uses it if it keeps the conservatives in the business, eventually, even if it works.
Being an opposition party is a certain hypocrisy, a trick of confidence; Therefore, Ms. Badenoch has to tell her followers, and the country, that they can win the next election and how it can be done, improperly it may feel now.
In theory, she is correcting some things. Conference slogan “Strong economy, strong limits“Identify two major battlegins – although essentially shakes the unfortunate memories of the economy’s mismanagement of the economy and failure to” stop the boats “sage Sunak, both chapters have been left slightly in their speech. The argument shows the benefits of his” practical “approach. Hundreds of seats of his party Handle more in local government 10 East Tory-controlled County CouncilSome remarkable DefectionIt is a pity, then, that “homework” he has generated to explain his new policies, mostly, proved so scary.
Flagship policy, very anticipated, it is The UK should leave the European Conference on Human RightsMs. Badenoch has provided a 188-page document that provides closely arguments. Lord VolphsonWhich he explained to justify his new policy, to lift technical heavy. Nevertheless, in fact, it is not. It is only a silk-focused cloak for a piece of political campaign. He tasked Prabhu learned with five questions, such as a “sovereign parliament”, such as Britain’s, in highly pejorative words, is barred from harassing veterans, or exclusion of foreign criminals. Volphson’s report exceptionally clearly outlines these brakes which is uncontrolled, politically motivated executive power. However, the entire point of ECHR is to apply an external control to an external control of an external power in a staggering or weak democratic system, where a parliamentary majority can be misused to suffer minorities, eliminating long -running domestic rights, an independent press, compromise -free election, and an independent judicial, and an independent judicial, and an independent judicial services can be abolished. Thus, extinguish democracy itself.
Echr is in the form of an self-reflecting ordinance, and to provide an external, independent appeal to people and individuals to request their case to be requested if domestic governments, laws and courts fail to protect uncomfortable human rights. For example, when Mussolini handled Mussolini, and why the Vimar ended Germany, and the 1935 Nurnberg laws were “democratically implemented by” a “sovereign parliament”. In fact, what is the collapse of highly civilized societies in barbarism Winston Churchill Was thinking about when he promoted the Council of Europe and Echr after the last World War. It is the worst pride to show off that Britain is so correct in its great traditions that it is always immune to any internal failures requiring external reforms.
What Ms. Badenoch asked by Lord Wolfson was wrong questions, even though, in strict legal terms, she answered them “correctly”. And, for the record, he did not say Belfast Good Friday Agreement It will not be affected, rather that “political arguments in sports are complex, and are beyond the scope of this legal advice”. A lot can be said for the rest of the legal ruminations. He certainly did not give advice, as Ms. Badenoch feels how an alternative dictatorship, which removes every institution in the manner of the President, can be legally appropriate. The minister, who used an unpleasant protector in jail arbitrarily, should be stopped from breaking the law, even if the press and election are approved.
For other big ideas of Ms. Badenoch on immigration, “Expulsion force“, This is also less evidence-based or thought, let us be human alone. Who will work for such an agency? How is it accountable for whom? How will such forces move forward because it tries to exist 150,000 people a yearWho has never been found guilty in the court of law of any crime, and only waiting to assess the claim of his asylum? What procedure will be followed to justify their forced expulsion? What if their original countries refuse to take them? If there is no hearing or tribunal, how should there be legally sound – a civil servant has not given any support for the law after taking a decision? Will the captive corpus be suspended? In fact, human rights will be openly abused and allowed to be abused under new domestic laws, which cannot be challenged in an independent court of law? It is unprecedented and first unconstitutional. And, by the way, on climate change and Pure zero target abolishedWhere is the Badenoch plan to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases? absent. The dog ate his homework.
Ms. Badenoch is right to renew her party, control the country’s borders and introduce a new economic policy Sir Mail StreedOne of his more grounded colleagues, trying to do it. Despite the contrast contradictions, he will have to try to achieve the audience and grab the headlines. He will have to take Nigel Faraj as a clear and current threat to the very stability of the society, not only his party – and need to clarify that there will be no deal with him before or after the election. Each Democrat should be wished for providing effective opposition-but not, if it seems, its entire political strategy is based on the attempt to disintegrate the US Constitution of out-fig and app Donald Trump.
The Conservative Party has sometimes faced enthusiasm in the government in the past, and has been restrained in various ways by the courts, press and Parliament, but before that it is not so hostile to universal human rights before that before that it is very essence of freedom. It is becoming a party that advocates an alternative dictatorship, which is hardly a Tory tradition. Who would stop the future Prime Minister, as Boris Johnson tried, illegally proroging – ie suspended – Parliament if the Supreme Court is unable to do so?
Ms. Badenoch will definitely lose the next election if she brings Tories to the market as only a low racist, more rational and well -designed version, but shares the same powerful instinct and the kind of policies that will separate Britain. He still has not found the right path in power.