A Shanti Sauda in Gaza Agonizately is closeFirst Hamas indicated that it was not likely to say, so it said yes. But what did it say that it was the cavet – and it did not happen Benjamin Netanyahu’s dealThe Israeli Prime Minister agreed.
As Bell True, IndependentChief International Correspondent, Write“So far, neither Netanyahu nor Hamas have agreed to every specific point of the scheme”. Instead, she says, “Both have publicly announced their interpretations of the proposal and vow to support it”.
However, what is the general basis for both sides Has agreed to a ceasefire And that we have agreed to release some of the remaining living hostages, which are the most important things. The rest can be further interacted.
Parties for peace plan are therefore in a gray zone This will be familiar with Sir Tony BlairOne of its writers. He was able to secure the agreement Between the federals and Republicans in Northern Ireland Through “creative ambiguity” in 1998. It is honestly expected that a uniform effort to ensure words means what people want to do them, will be successful here.
We find ourselves in an unpredictable position to welcome the efforts of the two most unexpected pacifers. Donald Trump has not created any secret of his ambition to win the Nobel Peace Prize. He Claims to end seven wars alreadyBut if he can bring peace in one eighth place in Gaza, he can be worth it.
He may have left it late for this year’s award, which will be declared on Friday, but for which nominations were closed on 31 January, just 11 days after his inauguration for his second term as the President of the United States. The Norwegian, a five-confirmation body appointed by the Norwegian Parliament, is cautious about awarding prizes in any case, until time has passed that does not confirm the stability of peace in question.
Perhaps next year, again. If there is peace in Gaza, and if it is constant, then it will be worth it, whatever is uncomfortable ambiguity which will have to bear and whatever it is Fierceness This is to be humble.
Other potential peacemakers are Sir Tony Blair. He has opposed to him, Due to the disaster of Iraq warBut again, if he can contribute to the end of bloodshed in Gaza and can start a better future for the Palestinian population there and his contribution to the West Bank should also be welcomed.
We have been pessimistic about the possibility of the early end of this unilateral, protest war as it seemed that Shri Netanyahu had calculated that the way he could stick to power was to prolong it.
But if the draft of Shri Trump’s frustration and Sir Tony Blair’s 20-Bindu Yojana for a place in the history borne by the Nobel Prize, the Israeli Prime Minister understood that his interest is now best served peacefully, which is a prize beyond the price.
Whatever happens in the next few days, the stability of any ceasefire will be uncertain. The last point of any peace deal will be disputed, sliced in ambiguity and apparently irreparable difference.
But we welcome the most promising hope of peace, because the war reaches its second anniversary, which we have seen so far.