Bayer Makes Chemicals That Cause Cancer….Then Sells You The Cure?

by

Ok folks, buckle up for this one!

I want to say right at the onset that I am not accusing Bayer of doing anything illegal or wrong.

Ok?  We clear on that?

But I do believe investigative journalism is still legal in this country and what this man said in this video makes a LOT of sense to me.

Watch here:

Ok, so again I am not making any accusations here but the theory according to this man is that Bayer makes Glyphosate, farmers then spray that on their crops, the Glyphosate causes cancer, and the low and behold Bayer then also sells a cancer treatment.

Good work if you can get it, I guess!

But now I want to advance the story a bit because over the past month I’ve been writing and learning a lot about the power of Apricot Seeds to potentially “cure” cancer, even though I can’t legally call it a cure.

Here’s one such recent report:

The Seed They Tried to Silence: Apricot Seeds, Vitamin B17, and the Untold Story of Cancer

So I wondered…could there be an actual connection here?

Something that makes sense?

Could it be that the Glyphosate is “causing cancer” because it is killing the cancer-killing properties of the seeds within the plants?

The natural seeds God gave us in our food to protect us from cancer?

Could there be a full connection there?

So I went to AI and both ChatGPT and Grok both had some pretty incredible answers.

I’ll cut right to the chase and tell you they both said that yes, that theory makes sense and could very well be what’s happening!

Wow!

I told each model to analyze this from first principles thinking, not based on what Big Medicine has told us.  I wanted the AI’s to reason for themselves not just accept regurgitated Big Pharma and Big Medicine talking points.

I’ll jump you to the conclusion from ChatGPT because the answer was super long:

Conclusion

Approaching the question from fundamental biochemical logic, it appears that glyphosate could interfere with amygdalin on multiple levels, albeit mostly indirectly:

  • In the plant, glyphosate’s blockage of phenylalanine synthesis and its metal-chelating action likely reduce the amount of amygdalin produced and stored in seedsen.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.org. A glyphosate-exposed seed would thus start with a lower amygdalin content to begin with.

  • Chemically, glyphosate is unlikely to react directly with amygdalin or destroy its structure in the seed. It does not have the properties of a hydrolyzing agent, so amygdalin can coexist with glyphosate in a seed without spontaneously breaking down.

  • In the human body, glyphosate could diminish the breakdown of amygdalin into its active components. By chelating enzyme cofactors and exerting antibiotic effects on gut microbesehjournal.biomedcentral.com, glyphosate might slow or limit the enzymatic release of cyanide from amygdalin. This would reduce amygdalin’s bioavailability and “intended” action (whether that action is therapeutic or toxic).

  • Through indirect mechanisms – like depriving enzymes of metalsehjournal.biomedcentral.com or subtly altering gut pH and microbiota – glyphosate can create a biochemical environment less favorable for amygdalin’s activation and function. It essentially throws sand in the gears of the finely tuned processes that amygdalin requires for its effect.

In sum, while glyphosate and amygdalin do not interact like reagents in a test tube, glyphosate’s presence “in or around” amygdalin-rich seeds could undermine the production and efficacy of amygdalin. It can be reasoned that glyphosate would decrease the amount of amygdalin available in the seed and decrease the cyanide yield from amygdalin in the body. This logical analysis aligns with glyphosate’s known role as a metabolic disruptor and chelator, suggesting that glyphosate contamination might indeed blunt whatever biological activity amygdalin would otherwise have, for better or for worse.

And from Grok, it confirms the same conclusion:

Summary: Glyphosate and Seeds / Amygdalin Link

  • Glyphosate basics:
    Works by mimicking natural phosphate compounds and blocking key plant enzymes. This disrupts essential pathways (like amino acid synthesis), starving the plant of proteins and structural materials.

  • Impact on seeds:

    • Direct: Reduced protective compounds in seeds (weaker coats, altered chemistry).

    • Indirect: Plant stress leads to fewer, smaller, or poorly developed seeds.
      Even small glyphosate residues could influence seed pH or enzyme function.

  • Amygdalin (B17/Laetrile):
    A sugar-bound molecule that releases cyanide when broken down, acting as a natural defense in seeds.

  • Glyphosate’s potential inhibition:

    • Blocks early steps in aromatic precursor pathways needed for amygdalin production.

    • Less amygdalin in seeds = weaker plant defense + reduced potential use for humans.

    • Indirect effects include altered enzymes, nutrient profiles, or soil microbe disruption.

  • Long-term evolutionary effect:
    Glyphosate exposure may favor plants that naturally produce less amygdalin (lower metabolic cost under stress).

  • Overall:
    Glyphosate likely reduces amygdalin levels indirectly by choking off its biosynthetic pathway. The link isn’t a direct neutralization but a metabolic upstream blockade.

Two AI models running independently of each other and they both reached the same conclusion!

ALSO READ  The prize is now $ 100,000

Namely, that it’s very likely that Glyphosate reduces Amygdalin by choking off its biosynthetic pathway.

The result?

The cancer killer is reduced in our food, cancer grows in our bodies!

Wow!

Here’s how to fight back:

The Seed They Tried to Silence: Apricot Seeds, Vitamin B17, and the Untold Story of Cancer

If you tell someone you eat Apricot Seeds every day, chances are you’ll get a raised eyebrow—or maybe even a stern warning: “Be careful—those have cyanide in them!”

That phrase has echoed through media headlines, government rulings, and medical offices for decades. It has fueled fear, controversy, and even criminal prosecutions. But what if we’ve been told only half the story?

What if Apricot Seeds, and the compound within them known as Vitamin B17, were never the poison they were painted to be—but rather one of nature’s most overlooked tools in the fight against cancer?

This is the story of the seed they tried to silence. 

A Bitter History

At the heart of the controversy lies a natural compound called amygdalin, also known as Vitamin B17. Found in the kernels of apricots, bitter almonds, and over 1,200 other fruits and plants, amygdalin breaks down in the digestive process into glucose, benzaldehyde, and cyanide.

That last word—cyanide—is the lightning rod.

To the public, “cyanide” conjures images of poison capsules and crime dramas. What’s rarely explained is that the cyanide in B17 is not free-floating and destructive. It is bound within the amygdalin molecule. Nature designed it with a safety lock.

The “key” that unlocks it is an enzyme called beta-glucosidase—an enzyme found in much higher concentrations around cancer cells than around healthy cells. When amygdalin meets cancer cells, the key turns, the bond breaks, and the cell is destroyed.

Meanwhile, healthy cells are protected by another enzyme, rhodanese, which neutralizes any cyanide release, converting it into harmless byproducts. In this way, B17 functions like a smart weapon: targeting cancer cells while sparing normal ones.

This elegant mechanism has been described in detail by G. Edward Griffin in his landmark book, World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17. But outside natural health circles, the distinction between bound cyanide and free cyanide has been lost—or deliberately obscured. 

ALSO READ  If you have never bought a crypto before, read it now! (From Noah) | WLT Report

Apricot Seeds, Vitamin B17, and the Untold Story of Cancer:
The Suppression Begins

In the 1970s, Dr. John A. Richardson, MD was at the center of this storm. At his San Francisco clinic, he administered Laetrile (a purified, clinical form of amygdalin) to cancer patients. Many of these patients were considered beyond hope, having exhausted surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation.

What he witnessed was extraordinary. Some of the sickest patients began to recover strength, shrink tumors, and regain quality of life. Hope was returning where none had been left.

But regulators saw something else. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched raids. Vials of Laetrile were confiscated. Dr. Richardson and his staff were arrested—not for harming patients, but for daring to give them a choice outside of government-approved treatments.

The message was clear: this wasn’t about science. It was about control.

They weren’t silencing quackery. They were silencing a story of hope.

The Science They Don’t Talk About

Critics to this day insist there is “no credible evidence” that B17 or Laetrile works. Yet, a closer look at the scientific record reveals a more complex story.

  • Promising studies were halted midstream or defunded.
  • Researchers who pursued amygdalin risked their reputations or lost their grants.
  • Patient recoveries were dismissed as “anecdotes,” even when cases were documented and verified

Chapter 6 of Griffin’s book, World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17, titled “The Total Mechanism,” lays out the metabolic theory of cancer. In this framework, cancer is not a random mutation but a deficiency disease—comparable to scurvy or pellagra—arising when a vital nutrient (in this case, B17) is absent from the diet. Reintroduce the nutrient, and the body regains its natural defense against rogue cells.

Chapter 7, The Cyanide Scare, dismantles the propaganda that equates amygdalin’s bound cyanide with the free cyanide used in poisons. The distinction is the same as comparing:

  • Sodium chloride (table salt) with elemental sodium (explosive) or chlorine gas (toxic).
  • Water (H₂O) with hydrogen (flammable) and oxygen (supports combustion).

Chemistry is about context. The whole compound behaves differently from its parts. 

Why the Fear?

If the science is more nuanced than the headlines suggest, why has the fear narrative been so persistent? The answer, many argue, lies in economics.

Cancer is a multi-billion-dollar industry. Surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and the endless pipeline of patented drugs sustain an empire of research grants, hospital revenues, and pharmaceutical profits.

A natural substance like B17 cannot be patented. You cannot own the rights to an Apricot Seed. And where there is no patent, there is no incentive for investment.

Instead of exploring B17’s potential, the system invested in burying it. Articles warned of “toxic seeds.” Regulators banned distribution. Medical boards threatened physicians who experimented.

The real danger wasn’t that Apricot Seeds would kill patients. It was that they might kill the Golden Goose of endless profits.

What the Public Deserves to Know

Here are truths you will rarely hear in mainstream reporting:

  • Apricot Seeds have been consumed for centuries. In cultures ranging from the Hunza of northern Pakistan to parts of the Mediterranean, diets rich in B17-containing foods have been associated with astonishingly low cancer rates.
  • The body has natural safeguards. Healthy cells produce rhodanese, an enzyme that detoxifies bound cyanide. Cancer cells lack this defense. That’s why amygdalin selectively targets malignant cells.
  • B17 is not a silver bullet—but part of a metabolic approach. When paired with enzymes, nutrients, and lifestyle changes, it may help the body restore balance and eliminate malignant growth.
ALSO READ  Praying Your Family into the Kingdom of God | WLT Report

These facts don’t make headlines. But they make a difference to patients searching for hope. 

Reclaiming the Narrative

Today, we live in an era of renewed debate about medical freedom, natural health, and informed consent. Patients are asking more complex questions. Families are demanding alternatives. And communities are rediscovering that healing can come from God-given resources, not just patented pills.

So the question isn’t only: Does B17 work?

The question is: Shouldn’t patients have the right to decide for themselves?

That was the principle Dr. John Richardson, MD, fought for in the 1970s. And it is the principle that drives Operation World Without Cancer (OWWC) today. We exist to restore truth to healthcare, to fund research into natural solutions, and to provide patients with access to options that have been silenced for too long.

It’s time to re-examine the seed they tried to silence. Because it may well be the seed of hope our world has been waiting for. 

The Bigger Picture: From Scurvy to Cancer

History offers perspective.

Centuries ago, scurvy ravaged sailors on long voyages. The cause was unknown until a straightforward observation changed everything: when sailors ate citrus fruit rich in Vitamin C, scurvy disappeared. Once governments required limes and lemons aboard ships, scurvy was virtually eradicated. British sailors became known as “limeys”—a nickname that spoke to a medical breakthrough.

Other deficiency diseases tell the same story:

  • Beriberi, once a mysterious condition, vanished with the discovery of Vitamin B1 (thiamine).
  • Pellagra, which killed thousands in the American South, was solved with niacin (Vitamin B3).

Each time, what appeared to be a curse of nature was revealed to be a lack of a vital nutrient.

Could cancer be similar? Could it be that what we call “the Emperor of All Maladies” is, in part, a deficiency disease made worse by modern diets stripped of seeds, kernels, and other natural sources of B17?

This is the radical but hopeful proposition at the heart of the B17 story: that humanity may already hold the key to making cancer as rare in the future as scurvy is today.

Looking Forward: A World Without Cancer

Imagine a world where:

  • Doctors are trained in both pharmaceutical and nutritional therapies.
  • Patients can choose natural approaches without fear of criminalization.
  • Clinical trials validate and refine therapies like B17, bringing them out of the shadows.
  • Cancer prevention is as simple and normalized as scurvy prevention became with the introduction of citrus.

That’s not a fantasy. It’s a vision. And with courage, it can become a reality.

Join the Movement

The debate over Apricot Seeds and Vitamin B17 isn’t just about one nutrient. It’s about the right of every patient to access natural, God-given options for healing.

At Operation World Without Cancer, we are dedicated to advancing this cause through education, clinical trials, and public awareness initiatives. Together, we can challenge the narratives that kept hope buried for too long.

Because history shows that sometimes the answers aren’t in the lab—they’re in the orchard. 

Take Action

  • Download the book that started it all: Get your free PDF of World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17 at myworldwithoutcancer.com.
  • Learn more and support the mission: Visit OWWC.org. Every donation helps bring truth back into healthcare. Together, we can make cancer HISTORY.
  • Discover B17 products and Apricot Seeds: Explore natural options at RNCstore.com/wlt. Use the discount code WLT at checkout for 10% off your purchase.