A new video showing a separate camera angle of Charlie Kirk shooting has now emerged.
Very clearly, I still wonder that we have not watched hundreds of different videos from different angles, given that everyone has phones and most of the people of that crowd were excluding their phones.
So I am most surprised at the complete lack of videos seen so far, but here is a new one from the angle which is most interesting for me.
Did anyone shoot Charlie a little behind him and his right?
I definitely don’t know, but I know that a lot of evidence says it makes a lot of understanding.
Watch this new video here, where I believe you can see Frank Tureke in the foreground:
https://x.com/_therealbee_/status/196590042342977279?
more here:
https://x.com/maimunkanews/status/196586666604094423531
One more here:
https://x.com/unce duenewsw/status/1965887474917642636
And if they are working now (I am noticeing some of the extreme censorship of that video on X) instead of trying this:
Another here, with a third scene….
Is this a video entering the video (video) and then exiting out (video)?
https://x.com/block1capital/status/1967986063114375338?
And another backup is here that the link is not working either:
So there you guys go …
What do you think?
I think it is possible that Charlie Kirk was shot from behind and on his right, this deep dive was read, which I kept together:
Deep Dive: Do we all see a exhaust wound or an entrance wound? – All this is JFK again!
Okay friends, I have now sat on this story for 3 days because I am digging and researching it and does not want to publish it ahead of time.
I still have more questions than the answer, but I think we have to ask this question at least now: Was Charlie Kirk’s neck wound that we saw and blood was an entrance wound or a exhaust wound?
Crazy also looks crazy to ask right?
Yes, at least until you start digging and then you realize that it probably seems more evidence that it is a exhaust wound that we all have been fed.
I will show you and then I will let you decide what you think… and we can all continue to research it together.
I will start with my friend Mike Adams, Healthrangar, who asks this very respectable question, stating that the 30-06 rifle will release a huge exhaust wound and almost certainly blood on the back wall. And yet … we have none of those things:
I do not mean to be graphic, and I mean there is no disrespect for Charlie Kirk and his tragic murder, but should we not ask that when she was shot, why does not a exhaust wound and blood sprainky appear on the big white banner directly behind Charlie? If the shot came …
– HealthRanger (@Healthranranger) September 14, 2025
I do not mean to be graphic, and I mean there is no disrespect for Charlie Kirk and his tragic murder, but should we not ask that when she was shot, why does not a exhaust wound and blood sprainky appear on the big white banner directly behind Charlie? If the shot comes from the roof with the front-front shot, then there will be a direct blood sprinkler behind Charlie. The period of 30-06 rifle would have traveled through the meat in all ways and made a very large exhaust path with it carrying blood and tissue. Then, apologize to being graphic, but I do not know any other way to ask this question. This is just that this is another thing that is not adding. And like you, I just need answers. I want to know who did this.
more here:
🚨 They are hiding camera footage from behind Charlie because it either shows no exhaust wounds or is not incompatible with a .30-06 caliber round?
Where is the exhaust wound blood splash?
It revalces a cover-up!
This man showed and removed the camera after Charlie … pic.twitter.com/6b9waihmss
– Red Pill USA (@Red_Pill_us) 16 September, 2025
There is no blood of any kind on the white wall.
The rear camera is disintegrated within 15 minutes and is taken, not by the authorities.
This is the heart of the crime site and it becomes almost immediately cleaned and no blood was found.
It is a blood wall.
Workers are pressed against the place where their boss’s blood was scattered during murder.
They are not watching it. Not cautious. Not even careful.
It is truly a crime site immediately after a political murder. pic.twitter.com/aypta96qmx
– Hustlebitch (@hustlebitch_) September 15, 2025
I want to be very clear that I am not especially accusing anyone in the crowd, just trying to get the angle and trajectory and ask questions about the things that are not understood.
The more you study the video and the more you watch, the ensure that Charlie was shot up by his right:
This is the most solid video ever I have seen.
-When it seems that we have seen an exit wound on the left side of the neck.
-It is more understandable that Charlie was shot slightly back near the ladder outside his right side.
Sound/response and was … pic.twitter.com/1k6msxtegl
– How (@iamacat9000) September 15, 2025
more here:
Those bullets are in the land we speak. The neck wound had gone out. Charlie was shot from the right rear pic.twitter.com/tzl0gxmo
– 🔨 Hammer 🔨 (@Hamartruuth 7) September 15, 2025
I apologize for the graphic nature of this video, but it shows it very well:
The more I see it, the more I enter the bullet above my right ear, as we look at it, the wound of exit is through his neck.
The shooter was not on the roof, that man JSut was a distraction. pic.twitter.com/uxoiyrtbypy
– ((@Abailault September 17, 2025
Why has anyone not shown us footage from this camera?
Drop it down to people, you will never see what this camera has been recorded:
https://x.com/owenshroyer1776/status/19683073966663137488
We need to see this camera:
This is why they are hiding “tent camera” in Charlie Kirk’s murder!
That camera has evidence and all information is required to know what has actually happened here.
Disregard the circle and see the scene! pic.twitter.com/qprsrqruop
– in2thinair (@in2thinair) September 15, 2025
This video breaks it really well …
Look at this:
For long -term breakdown, it is really good.
See here:
I swear by Almighty God, FBI is lying.
The government is lying to us.
This is a exhaust wound in front of her neck.
Before you go mad, or get angry, because I am questioning the story, watch the video.
Please share. pic.twitter.com/xi6royfmw8
– Jason Corsie (@jasoncoursey) 16 September, 2025
Understand this …
Mjtruth is present here:
Update: Charlie Kirk
Charlie is seen 5 minutes after shooting, a man is seen to remove overhead video camera, directly on Charlie Kirk’s head
This is an active crime scene … blood everywhere… and he stands in it? Why is he removing anything? Was he standing up … https://t.co/58njh4kzrz pic.twitter.com/vavscodsyw
– MJTRTHULTRA (@MJTRUTHULTRA) September 15, 2025
And in the meantime, they are already confirmed at the crime site?
Is this normal?
why would you do that?
Update: Charlie Kirk
Construction work is going on where Charlie Kirk was murdered
🔻 My thoughts…
In fact it is not certain what to feel about it … I personally feel that enough time has passed for them to investigate them, but the construction seems very terrible soon.it… https://t.co/ej9pju0ytj pic.twitter.com/noalpz06YQ
– MJTRTHULTRA (@MJTRUTHULTRA) September 15, 2025
Then you have this …
have you seen this?
Whatever this child saw, an eyewitness was testifying and he was cut almost immediately and was bitten:
Charlie Kirk’s safety gave the right moment by hand that he shot.
Charlie Kirk employees silenced the eye witnesses.
This smells. pic.twitter.com/pslob82qxy
– Adam (@Adammedia) September 15, 2025
Why not let him speak?
it’s really funny!
Many people are saying that it was a palm pistol and I want to clarify that I am not accusing anyone of anything:
It was a palm pistol: https://t.co/bmnudythcg pic.twitter.com/vf9xakztl1
– Val Venice ™ (@Valvenisent) September 15, 2025
Friends, my head is moving but I can no longer ignore all this.
Help me, what do you think?