Bill Gates is again on this, playing the role of God …
Because their built -in covers and fruits and vegetables with coatings and shells and peels are not enough for Bill Gates.
He has made his own.
You have probably heard of her coating called APIL because we have covered it here before, but now she has created a “organic” version that seems absolutely disgusting and perhaps not at all safe.
Check it out and definitely see that before buying anything with Apple or “orgenipil” label at the grocery store:
Bill Gates has created a “organic” version of its fruits and vegetables, which is called orgenipil and you cannot make it.
“OrganiPil has been registered as an insecticide with EPA, but it is still eligible for that organic sticker” (Document evidence is shown)
“Where is it here… pic.twitter.com/dellpiecfk
– Wall Street Apps (@Walsteps) September 2, 2025
Bill Gates has created a “organic” version of its fruits and vegetables, which is called orgenipil and you cannot make it.
“OrganiPil has been registered as an insecticide with EPA, but it is still eligible for that organic sticker” (Document evidence is shown)
“Here is this crazy. The content list of orgenipil you have citric acid 0.66% and other ingredients are 99.34%. There is no transparency, no complete disclosure. You are simply getting a secret coating on your food.
And the warning label causes medium eye irritation, avoid exposure to eyes or clothes. Wear safety glasses before handling, after handling and before eating, wash it thoroughly with soap and water after using, drink, chewing, to tobacco or toilet.
So you need safety glasses to use it but is it okay to eat? But don’t worry, they say it is the plant-based, but the agent was Orange.
So the next time you cut into your biological yield, ask yourself, what am I really eating?
Just something to think about.”
Now, let’s make sure it is accurate, because we do good work here and we do not post random videos from the Internet.
I grabbed to ask if these claims were real and confirmed that they are:
Yes, the main claims in the X post about Epil’s orgenipil product seem to be accurate based on the available documents, although some aspects include interpretation or opinion (eg, compared to agent Orange is rhetoric and not literally).
Here is the breakdown of major points for verification:
Products and Companies:
OrganiPil is a real post-cutting coating which is APAL Technology, Inc. (Now Epil Sciences), which is designed to expand the shelf life of fresh yield by acting as fungus or antimicrobial.This is applied as a thin, food layer obtained from plant-based materials.
EPA registration as a pesticide:
OrganiPil is actually registered with the US EPA as a pesticide under the EPA rage. Approved on number 92708-1, 7 June 2019.It is classified as a antimicrobial pesticides for subsequent use of harvesting on raw agricultural commodities.
composition:
EPA lists citric acid as an active ingredient at 0.66% by label weight, forms the remaining 99.34% with “other ingredients”.These “other components” are not perfectly wide on public labels (common for passive components in pesticides), but the apel described them as plant-based monoglycerides and digliserides in some yogas as well as plant-based monoglycerides and diglities.
Citric acid is non-synthetic and is derived from natural sources, which align with its allowances in some contexts.
Organic Certification Eligibility:
Despite being an EPA-managed pesticides, OrganiPil is an omary-list (Organic Material Review Institute) as a fungicidal approved for using USDA on certified organic yield, which means that it complies with national biological program standards when directed.OMRI was approved around 2019, the same year as EPA registration.
However, some sources note that it has been closed in favor of new yogas by mid -2012.
Security warnings and precautions:
The EPA label involves caution to handle the product centered, such as:
“Moderate eye irritation causes. Avoid contact with eyes or clothes. Wear safety glasses while handling. Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling.”
It also notes that it can be harmful if swallowed, breathing, or absorbed through the skin.
These are standard for concentrated solutions and are not applied to the applied form on the yield, which is considered safe for consumption after regulatory reviews by EPA, FDA and international bodies.
Epil has addressed misunderstandings that are dangerous to distort these warnings.
Agent comparison to orange and comprehensive skepticism:
Post analogy for agent orange (a deforestation related to serious health issues due to contaminants such as dioxine) is an opinion that is to highlight that the “plant-based” is not automatically risk-free.While orgenipil is a plants and safe as approved, the post raises legitimate questions about transparency in the post “other ingredients” and industrialization of biological food-Some of the organic advocacy resonates in discussions.
However, no evidence suggests that it is comparable to the agent orange in poisoning or effects.
overall:
The post accurately represents the EPA label details and organic status, but it increases concerns for the emphasis.If you are concerned about yield coatings, look for a label that indicates the use of the apel (although not always not necessary) or choose without options from local sources.
Even Mitchell Pfeiffer has destroyed Bill Gates on this hellish product.
Check out of Page six,
Mitchell is destroying the appeal of Pfeifer Apel.
The “dark shadow” actress on Thursday blasted the “very related” food spray brand, Epil Sciences through her Instagram stories, when the brand turned into FDA after the FDA-incorporated on USDA-certain organic production.
“Apoles (a food, plant-based coating was designed to expand fresh fruits and shelf life of vegetables) and now the ‘organic’ yield is coated in something that we can see or wash,” Finefar wrote, adding a final “very related” note.
He followed the post with an edited list of groups, which would not be selling products using the apel, urging his followers to check the complete list on the link included in the post.
In his primary post, he re-shared a reel, reading: “Organic production is no longer safe. Bill Gates’ Epil was approved for USDA-prohibited organic.”
It is worth noting that Gates are not associated with the food tech brand.
Established by Entrepreneur James Rogers in 2012, APIL was awarded two grants from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2012 and 2015, less than $ 1.1 million.
The brand also released a public message in April 2024, removing itself from Gates.
“Bill Gates’s Epil has zero participation or ownership. We are a team that gives importance to honesty and transparency, which is dedicated to enhancing the access and stability of food.”
Of course AP has done its “fact check” and can you guess what they have concluded?
Do you think they tried to control damage to Bill Gates?
I do not hold any stake in this and in fact I always say that this MSM “Fact Czech” is only useful in the sense that they tell you that we are really on the target and they are in damage control mode, but what to be fair here AP You want to believe:
Claim: A safety data sheet for Epil Sciences, a company that creates a protective coating that is used to keep fruits and vegetables fresh, indicating that its product may cause eye damage and allergic skin reaction.
Evaluation of AP: Wrong. The safety document being quoted is for an unrelated cleaning product that uses the same name. This product is made by a separate, UK-based company.
Facts: California-based epil Sciences are in markets that its plant-based solutions can fresh fruits and vegetables can keep fresh and longer on their head-and it is also edible.
But social media posts are distorting the safety of the product that is known as Adipil, confusing it with an unrelated cleaning product that shares a name with Epillas.
A tweet reads, “If you look at Epil logo on any fruit and vegetarian, it is a bill gates and weF company, this chemical at this time finalizes 3x up to 3x and cannot be washed in the US and Canada at this time,” reads a tweet.
The tweet contains the screenshot of a safety data sheet for a product called “Epil”. The document involves the “danger details”, including: “causes severe eye damage,” “an allergy can cause skin reaction” and “harmful to aquatic life with long -lasting effects.”
However, the document is being cited, not for the adipil of Apel. It was uploaded online by Evans Vanodine, a UK company, which makes a product called “Apple” that is a hard surface cleaner. The logo and name of that company is also visible on the security data sheet.
Representatives of APL Sciences emphasized that their yield-security product is not related to the cleaner and it is safe to consume.
The company uses lipids or plant oils of plants found naturally in fruits and vegetables and “to maintain moisture and reduce oxidation” makes the coating on the surface of fresh fruits and vegetables, “Jenny DU, the co-founder of the apel and senior vice-president of the operation Jenny DU said Jenny DU.
The coating contains pure monoglycerides and diclycerides, which DU reports that also found in products such as infant sutras; The compounds are designated by the Food and Drug Administration as “generally accredited as”, or grass, food attainment. In the US, Apeel’s coating is used on products such as avocado and apple.
Apeel’s website provides product safety information sheet.
Du said that confusion with unrelated cleaning product is not an issue until the most recent match of the online wrong Bayani, Du said. He said that there is also an Australian company that creates an odor-platform, which has been sold as “Apple” that can lighten further confusion.
“The unfortunate thing is that you can definitely have different companies with similar names, such as trademarks, when they are very different industrial classes,” Du said, which holds a PhD in Chemistry.
APIL Sciences received early developmental support from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2012 and then in 2015.