Yesterday, I brought you this report which we learned from the newly declassified Durham Annex:
And now today as we continue to pour over the documents, so much more is becoming clear.
And it’s all implicating Barack Hussein Obama as the key ringleader.
For those of you who prefer video, watch more right here.
Ah, hello Pat Gray. Welcome to the program. How are you?
Oh, man. Perfect. So good. Just on in almost everywhere. In almost every way. Yeah, pretty close.
Uh, it’s good to have you here. I wanted to bring in Jason here real quick, our head researcher, because last night we did an epic show — which I know you watched, right?
Right. Pat.
Oh, did I?
Right.
Yeah. I mean almost every episode of it you’ve watched pretty much, and almost every minute of every episode.
Exactly.
Almost. Why count?
Yeah. So last night we did an episode, and we started to lay out the case that the federal government has been, you know, laying out here in the last couple of weeks on the deep state.
And there’s so many things in here that the more you look at it, the more you read it, the more you’re like, “Okay, wait a minute. Wait a minute. I get it now.”
And one of those things comes from Loretta Lynch. Do you remember she was the head of the DOJ under Obama?
And she had a meeting at an airport on the tarmac with Clinton. Do you remember this vaguely?
Yeah, vaguely.
Let me refresh your memory. Here is the news report at the time. Listen.
Well, let’s bring it back here at home in Phoenix. In a very interesting meeting on the tarmac at Sky Harbor International Airport, ABC15 has confirmed former President Bill Clinton was in town and met up with US Attorney General Loretta Lynch as she was arriving in Phoenix.
Now, this meeting took place just hours before the release of the Benghazi report. So, we asked her about it.
I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as I was leaving, and he spoke to myself and my husband on the plane. Our conversation was a great deal about his grandchildren. It was primarily social and about our travels. He mentioned the golf he played in Phoenix.
So, wait. So, you’ve got a former president’s plane on the tarmac, and you’re holding things up because the attorney general wants to go over and talk to you about golf?
I mean, it just doesn’t seem credible. It didn’t seem credible at the time.
Well, last night we showed you the evidence and the documents on what they were talking about. And it wasn’t about golf or grandkids.
It apparently was a briefing on what the FBI was and was not going to investigate regarding Benghazi and all of the leaked emails.
Jason, you want to fill it in?
It wasn’t just grandkids and golf. It was also vacation plans, Glenn. So, let’s be exactly accurate on those vacation plans. That’s important as well.
Okay. Sure.
For sure.
If you watched last night, you probably felt like this show was a little familiar because you’re like, “Wait a minute, I remember that. I remember that we had these questions. This was missing.”
Well, the Durham Annex is providing a lot of that now. What we found was — we’re not entirely 100% sure that this is what they’re talking about — but just like with all these things, there’s a lot of common sense involved.
They’re not talking about golf and grandkids or vacation plans.
What we found from the Durham Annex is one of the intelligence releases was that the Obama administration — and this is almost a direct quote — was said to have been willing to use all administrative levers to make sure that the Clinton email server scandal would go away as far as other emails.
We later find out that there was another memo that said President Obama was very willing to use Attorney General — names specifically — Loretta Lynch to leverage the FBI to make sure that this happened.
She was part of all these administrative levers that he was willing to use.
Well, now that’s interesting because then the FBI all of a sudden said, “You know what? I don’t think we can consider these intelligence reports credible. Yeah, we’re just going to pretend that they never happened, that they’re — poof — gone, that they don’t mean anything.”
And what’s also on top of that is at the same time the FBI suddenly says, “Oh, these servers, these emails that have been stolen — we’re just going to farm that out for somebody else. This is top secret information. We’re going to farm that out to a private company, CrowdStrike, and we’re not even going to look into it ourselves. We’re going to take the word of these guys.”
Uh, wait a minute… what?
And we now know that this whole thing was really not about Donald Trump. This whole thing was about what is on the email servers, what emails were stolen by somebody — we assume the Russians — and what information they had that included Benghazi, all of these things.
They needed to know what the Russians had, and the CIA and FBI knew.
In fact, they found it so credible — was it Brennan or Clapper — who went and briefed the president immediately after getting the brief himself?
It was that important and deemed that credible at the time, that he went directly to the White House and said, “Mr. President, you need to know the Russians have — it looks like — this information off of these servers and it involves the DNC, what they were doing with Hillary Clinton versus Bernie Sanders, and forcing Bernie Sanders out.”
It has a lot of stuff about Benghazi, and some things about other topics like trying to smear Donald Trump with Russia.
They know about all of this stuff, and they know about the corruption, and it’s coming from a credible source.
That’s when Barack Obama did not want anybody to be able to smear his reputation. And so he said at that time, “Look, I’ll use special services.”
He puts this special services together — basically a mop-up team. Everybody working together to twist this and turn it back over and say, “No, they’ve got dirt on Donald Trump.”
That way, if it ever comes out, they can say, “Oh no, that’s Russian operatives doing this. They’re just trying to make Hillary Clinton look bad because they want to distract us from Donald Trump.”
It appears as though this really had nothing to do with Donald Trump as much as it did with covering up everything they had done that was dirty, wrong, and illegal.
You read it that way, Jason?
Yeah, I do. And I think the point — I mean, there’s so much more that’s involved with this. You mentioned CrowdStrike. That was also mentioned in the Durham Annex.
They said that CrowdStrike would specifically be used as an entity by the FBI to get the narrative out.
Now, it’s very interesting — if you watch last night’s show, we looked around. There’s no evidence the FBI ever looked at the servers that CrowdStrike said, “Look, this proves the Russians did this.”
They never looked at them. They took their word for it.
We were like, “Huh? How is that even possible? That’s kind of a big thing.”
So, we asked a source in the intelligence community, “This can’t be true, right?”
The source confirmed it — and the current intelligence community confirmed it — and said it looks like this is almost a direct quote: “They just relied on CrowdStrike.”
I mean… oh my gosh.
And I want to go back to the importance of the Loretta Lynch story here. It shows how far the Obama administration was willing to go, what they were willing to do to push this narrative forward of Donald Trump, but also to hide and silence — to use all administrative levers — to make sure that their scandals quietly went away.
It’s one of the craziest angles to this story.
And we find out later that the FBI seems to have been taking the lead in making sure a lot of this happened.
Later on, they would give a defensive briefing to Loretta Lynch to say, “Look, we’ve got this information — it might get out there that you were colluding with the Clinton campaign as part of this scheme. What do you have to say about it?”
And what she answered was — I have the quote memorized, Glenn, it’s a long one — ready?
She said, “Okay.”
And never denied any of the allegations.
That’s it. And they walked away.
The whistleblowers are now showing that they walked away saying, “That doesn’t make sense. How was she not outraged at being accused of this? Why did she just say, ‘Okay, thank you,’ instead of denying it outright?”
If somebody walks into my office and says, “Hey, Glenn, looks like you’re dirty and the Russians have you on tape doing X, Y, and Z, and we’re getting all kinds of legitimate intel on you,” you would immediately say, “Absolutely not. This is an outrage. Track this down — I didn’t do X, Y, and Z.”
She responded, “Okay.”
Yeah. Wait a minute.
So then when she’s out on the tarmac, it looks as though that was a briefing to tell the Clintons — because she couldn’t communicate directly to Hillary Clinton — and what a surprise, her husband (who can’t testify against her) gets onto the plane.
So they’re just a couple talking about grandkids?
She goes onto the plane and briefs Clinton: “Look, we want you to know your wife is safe on this, this, and this. We’ve handled this. The FBI is under control and they’re not going to investigate these things.”
That’s significant.
Yeah, very significant. And it’s common sense. These are the things that we pretty much knew were happening, but we never actually had the intelligence or the documents to back it up. Now we do.
And the tragedy in a lot of this is — these are all questions that the mainstream media could have gotten to way back in the day. They could have looked into these angles.
They could have — I don’t even know if they can now, Glenn, with the statute of limitations. Can they?
I don’t know.
Okay.
Yeah, they can if it is conspiracy — if they can tie the same people all the way to, let’s say, the Mar-a-Lago raid and that testimony, and show that this is part of the same conspiracy. Then it can go all the way back.
Yeah.
They can’t if they can’t tie it, then no. I mean, the annex goes on to say that this is one of the reasons why they gave the defensive briefing to Loretta Lynch — her reaction, everything, and all the fallout.
This “sensitive intelligence,” as it’s called — all this information leaking — our intelligence says gave Comey the reason to completely shut down the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server.
I mean, that right there — wow.
The fear was so palpable within the FBI. They didn’t know how to handle this. So, that was the reason he shut down the investigation.
And he gave the excuse of, “Oh, she didn’t have the intent.” Remember that? “There was no intent — you have to link intent to all of this.”
No. This memo says that was the reason — because of the information in this, they had to shut it down.
This story is only beginning.
I know. Just beginning.
Thank you, Jason. Thanks for coming in.
And it’s not just national security stuff. They were shutting it down because it would make Obama look bad. It would make the Democratic Party look really bad.
So this was not just national security stuff — it was also “save the Democratic Party.”
And if this is not prosecuted, if it is not revealed, if it’s not proven in court — has to be proven in court — then the message being sent is you’re never going to get shut down for anything.
Double down. We didn’t go far enough.
And it’s really dangerous. Very, very dangerous.
Okay, back in just a second.
Hello, Pat. How are you?
I’m… I’m a little disturbed — this whole Loretta Lynch thing. I mean, I really — I liked her when she sang Coal Miner’s Daughter. I really did.
Not to mention Stand By Your Man. I thought that was, you know, for country — that was a pretty good song.
That was Loretta Lynn.
Lynn.
Wait — not Lynch? It’s not the same Lynn? Not the same person?
Same… not the same.
No wonder. I thought, “Wow, when did she become so political? That doesn’t seem like her at all.”
Right. Right. Right.
Okay. Well, that helps.
You know what’s really sad? This story is so old now — it’s 10 years old.
Yeah.
You’ve forgotten it. I mean, you have a better chance of remembering all the words to Coal Miner’s Daughter than you do the meeting on the tarmac.
One of those things is important. The other one is not.
Sadly, that’s true.
Right. Sadly, there are many people in the country that would go, “I know — and that’s why I remember Coal Miner’s Daughter.“
Right.
Because it’s important.
Yes.
So it is — it’s a good walk down memory lane though, to remember all of the corruption and all of the crap we were going through at the time. And to have this come back around — and just the possibility of justice being served in this — it’s going to be…
Do you think it’s going to happen? Do you really?
I do. Because here’s the rumor — we talked about it on TV last night.
There has been a grand jury convened, and there may be multiple grand juries on the way.
And they’re not convening it in Washington, D.C.
We believe the first grand jury has been convened in Florida, which would be a very good thing.
Right.
But also, some of these things happened in Virginia. So you’ll be able to go into Virginia and also convene a grand jury.
You have a chance of this actually being heard by a fair jury.
So, we have Kristi Noem coming on in a little while on the program today, and I want to talk to her about this new thing where you don’t have to be under 40 to be in Homeland Security anymore.
I mean, you want to be a member of ICE and you don’t have to be under 40.
And so I thought, Stu — I mean, Pat — you and I should talk to her about, you know… you and I… I mean, I could grow some 1970s pork chop sideburns.
Uh-huh.
And one of those ‘70s mustaches. And we could both get a pair of white Velcro sneakers, right?
You know, at 60 — I don’t know if they still want it at 60 — but both of us have a really bad back. But we can do that.
Oh, yeah. We can do that. Not a problem.
Yeah.
Imagine all the Walmart greeters now that could be members of ICE.
And you know what? Honestly, those Walmart greeters kind of scare the hell out of me.
Some of them — you go to Costco and they’re like, “Excuse me, let me look at your receipt.” You’re like, “Okay, okay, okay… I won’t run.”
So, did you see J.B. Pritzker on Stephen Colbert last night?
Yeah. Yeah. Good stuff.
Wasn’t it?
Colbert actually brought up the gerrymandering — which was kind of surprising — and showed the gerrymandered map from Illinois, which is… interesting to say the least.
Here it is. Cut three, please.
Take a look at this. Look at 17 here — it does that. Then it comes up here and sneaks around there and goes all the way up here, and then goes right over there like that.
And look at this one — kind of goes whoop up there. It’s like the stinger on a scorpion down here.
Is this common for all states to do?
Well, we handed it over to a kindergarten class and let them decide.
Okay, that’s the nonpartisan group that does this for you guys?
That’s our independent commission, you know.
That is… yeah. I mean, so because all states to a certain extent do this, why is what Texas is doing particularly egregious in this case?
Well, here every 10 years we do a census in this country, and right after the census we redraw districts in every state. But what the Republicans are trying to do — and the Texas Republicans, frankly at the behest of Donald Trump — are doing it mid-decade. That is extraordinarily rare.
Oh, it’s perfectly fine. The problem is totally legal. Not a problem. But we’re doing it mid-decade.
Oh no. Yeah. Oh, ’cause that’s when we usually do things — after the census.
Except… this census has been shown to be flawed over and over and over again. This census was really a weird thing to — I mean, you know, you had Texas, you had Tennessee… where else? I think Arkansas, Oklahoma… you had all those states undercounted.
Yeah.
Undercounted. And then you had all of these blue states — they were overcounted, which was weird. This never happened before.
It was just really weird that it was in 2020.
Huh. How weird.
Yeah. And they were counting illegals. And you know — yes — there are some that say we shouldn’t count them as citizens. President Trump is one of those people who says, “Next time we’re not going to count illegal aliens.”
Hm. Yeah, that’ll be interesting — to take the number that we had and subtract the number we come up with the next time, where illegals aren’t counted, and maybe get a sense for how many illegal aliens there are in this country now?
I mean, can you imagine how many House seats would be lost in California if you stop doing that?
Yeah.
Yeah. Maybe some in Texas, of course — because how many illegals do we have here? Ten million? What is the number in California — 15 million, 20? Who knows?
We don’t really know. But it would be fascinating to find out one day.
Yeah, it sure would be fascinating. Sure would be fascinating.
I wonder if we ever, you know, if we ever will.
You know, did you see what’s happening in Seattle?
Yeah.
Where there’s the new — a female — Xiran Mandami running for mayor.
Is that what you’re…?
Well, I don’t know. I can’t define a woman. I don’t know what you mean by female. I don’t know why that is so important.
I mean, Mandami could very well be a female as well.
Um, yeah. So there’s this new Mandami. Now there’s a Somali that is a socialist in Minneapolis, right, that’s running for mayor.
Yep.
You now have this — I mean, they had a social democrat as a mayor in Seattle already, who was bad enough. Apparently that wasn’t… they weren’t strong enough.
This one is really militant and an activist. And they set up this ranked voting, and apparently she’s winning in the ranked voting.
So she’s now the candidate for the election this fall in Seattle.
I don’t… I don’t know. It seems to me that we are a country that is leaning toward socialism in some of these states and some of these cities.
Yeah, that’s going to be really difficult. I mean, how are you going to manage a capitalist society when you have large socialist cities?
Yeah.
Yeah. And she — by the way — she’s even more radical on the cops than what they’ve had in the past. She wants to replace the cops with, you know, I don’t know… doctors, psychiatrists.
Yeah. Psychiatrists. She wants that approach — not putting people in jail.
Can you imagine what Seattle will be like if she wins? And I bet you she wins.
I mean, look at this — it’s coast to coast now. New York City, Minneapolis, Seattle. You’ve got that screwball in South Portland, Maine. It’s happening all over the place.
And not just in large cities either. South Portland, Maine is not big.
I don’t think I’ve heard of the South Portland, Maine mayor.
It’s frightening. It’s frightening. We’ve got so many radicals.
And I think part of the problem is we’ve had radicals in our education system teaching our kids — who are now adults — and they’ve been sold on socialism.
They have been taught that capitalism is evil. You’re seeing that all over the internet now — how evil capitalism is, how it’s the root of every problem we have.
And you’ve got these influencers who are screaming about it on their dumb podcasts.
And so they just believe that capitalism is wrong and evil and contributing to all societal ills, when the opposite is true.
Well, what I like though is the mixture of socialist, communist, and Islamist.
Yes. When you get the Islamunist — that’s the perfect blend, isn’t it?
That is a really good addition to our society.
By the way, I want to play this. This is a Muslim sheikh, Sheikh Al-Ameen. He says that — well, I’ll let him speak for himself. Go ahead. Cut five.
If you sell a slave — now one would say slavery is banned. Said yes, it’s banned. But slavery was there, and slavery is not something that Muslims should be ashamed of.
Because people think that, oh, Islam promotes slavery. Does Islam promote slavery?
There is only one means of having slavery, and that is through capturing prisoners of war. Non-Muslims, disbelievers.
So if someone attacks my country, I — with the army — defend my country, and we get prisoners of war, what do we do with them? Send them to Guantanamo? No, we enslave them.
Oh, this is against human rights. Well, them attacking us is human rights?
No, this is human rights. How? This disbeliever who was an enemy of Islam, I can execute him and get it over with. But what I’m giving him is an honest and decent life by living in our houses and looking at how we treat them, and looking at how we worship Allah.
This would make them accept Islam voluntarily because there is no compulsion in religion.
And that is why the Prophet said in the authentic hadith, “I am astonished, I am amazed of people being dragged to paradise in chains.”
Who would be dragged to paradise in chains? Everybody goes to paradise willingly.
The Prophet is giving us a metaphor — because these prisoners of war, they were enslaved. So they were in chains, and these chains made them accept Islam, and hence enter paradise — as if they were dragged into it.
So, I mean, I think this is really good.
It’s perfectly reasonable. You know, people say that Islam promotes slavery, but there’s only one kind of slavery that is okay.
Now, that itself was kind of a “huh” moment for me, as I always thought, “No, there’s no reason slavery is okay.”
There’s not. But no — in Islam there is. But now you know better.
You know better. Now I know better. It is if you’re a prisoner of war, right? You’re a prisoner of war and you can convert to Islam, or you can be a slave — but you’re going to want to convert to Islam because you’re going to see how good Islam is, how we live our life, and all of the benefits…
…and you’re going to say, “You know what? If that’s the way they’re living their life, I want to be a part of that.”
So… no.
It seemed like the other alternative to converting — other than slavery — is that you can also be executed.
So you could die, you could convert, or you could be a slave.
But he made it very clear — there is no compulsion. Not in Islam to get to… not in Islam.
There is no compulsion.
No, it’s convert or die.
Uh-huh. But that’s not — I’m not forcing you. You can still choose. You have that wonderful third option of slavery.
So, it’s all about choice.
That’s beautiful.
No, it is. It is. And I’m so glad that in Minneapolis, you guys are starting to embrace this. You know, you’re like, “We haven’t really given the Islamists a chance to see how this works out. We haven’t in New York. Somebody who’s like, ‘Death to all Jews,’ and apparently also for slavery — but only in very specific…”
I mean, New York, you’ll still have the chance to convert, you know? Right? And stop your bellyaching. Just…
Right. Embrace it.
There’s no compul— they’re not going to force you. You’re going to want to join Islam.
Sure. That’s it. Or they’ll behead you.
It’s weird because there’s this book that I read one time, and towards the end it talks about how you’re going to be beheaded if you don’t accept the mark… and I can’t remember what that is, but it’s in some book.
Yeah, it’s some book that I read.
And don’t worry about that, especially if you’re in Australia — because there is a new queer religion in Australia. Cut four.
I only started thinking I might as well start a religion when Trump stood for election because I thought if you can get elected as president of the United States, then I can found my own religion.
Creation — an art in the form of a queer insurrectionary science-fiction climate-change religion.
It’s triumphant. It’s jubilant. It’s sorrowful, meaningful, incredibly artistic and…
…to be honest, it was a bit of a joke. A kind of a finger up to the establishment.
It has become something completely different, and offering, I guess, our idea of a better way.
I really wanted creation to be full of purposeful hysteria and pleasure and poetry and sexiness.
It has big feeling. It’s alluring. It’s glamorous. It’s magic. It’s witchcraft.
Is it activism or is it solace? I do not know.
Oh, wow. Is that brimstone I see coming down from the sky?
What could possibly be wrong with that?