The restricted group will be able to challenge Palestine Action House office As one in its prosecution in court Terrorist organizationA judge has ruled.
Hooda Ammori, co-founder of the Pro-Filistini Action Group, has demanded a challenge to the government’s decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws.
home Secretary Yweet cooper Decided to prosecute the group After the breakdown of the workers Norton broke RAF Sprayed two military aircraft in Oxfordshire and with red paint.
He also cited the group opposition in an arms tool factory in Glasgow in 2022, allegedly caused more than £ 1M damage, and in his decision a defense technology company, the targeting of the Albit System UK.
In early July, the ban came into force that Palestine expressed support for a criminal crime, membership or 14 years of jail sentence to support action.
More than 80 organizations are already being prosecuted under the Terrorism Act 2000 including al-Qaeda and Wagner Group.
The UK’s prosecution of Palestine’s action was last week condemned by the United Nations Human Rights Head of Anti-Terrorism Laws as a “disturbing misuse”.
Volcker Turk urged Britain to lift the ban, which he said was “inconsistent and unnecessary”.
In his judgment on Wednesday, Mr. Justice Chamberlane said that the reports of the arrest of Palestine protesters, who were not supporting Palestine’s action, have a cool effect on those wishing to express legitimate political views “. He said that this was “an indirect result of the prosecution order”.
Earlier this month, Ms. Ammori’s lawyers asked a judge to allow her to bring her. High court The challenge on the ban, describing it as an “illegal intervention” with freedom of expression.
Raza Hussain Casey for Ms. Ammori told the court that the ban had made Britain “an international external” and “represent”.
Mr. Hussain said: “In the decision to prosecute Palestine’s action, one was the hallmark of the misuse of powerist and power.”
Sir James ED Casey said in written presentations for the home office that by causing serious damage to the property, Palestine’s action was “squarely”, which was within the part of the terrorism laws used in the prosecution.
He said: “There is no reliable basis, which can be claimed that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence G.OverflowOr to intimidate a part of the public or the public, and with the aim of carrying forward a political, religious, racial or ideological cause. ,
This is a braking story.
Hot Mike has given us clear comments from world leaders about “mainstream media”.