Sir Grant curse Defeated the government’s decision to hide the frightening Afghan Debating the data leak from the public, saved life by debating the decision.
East Secretary of Defense Said that a superintendent that preventing the reporting of leaks should not have been until it was, but “there are things that the state has to do just secretly”.
Sir Grant told BBC Radio 4 that a few days after the data breech came to the public, breaking his silence, Today Program: “The public understands that there are times where you just have to work in the most maximum way to prevent people from being killed and executed, and it happened to a large extent in this matter.
“I don’t think it should have been taken as long as it was. But when I came in, I had a problem. I settled it, and as a result, I think we have saved life.”
It was discovered that the British spies and special Forces One of the thousands of soldiers was one of the potentially frightening Afghan data leaks.
Violation, made by one Ministry of Defence In February 2022, the official, exposed the details of the Afghans, seeking to escape in the UK as he claimed that the link of the British forces put him at risk of vengeance of the Taliban.
As a result of the blunder, 16,000 Afghans were influenced by data breech, which was drawn in Britain, still coming with some 8,000, and inspired an unprecedented two -year superinance to prevent publication of any details.
Now, defense sources have revealed that the names of more than 100 British government personnel, including MI 6 spies, members of SAS, MPs, government ministers and other senior military data, were also revealed.
After the latest revelations, Defense Secretary John Heela told MPs on Tuesday that “in a small number of cases, the names of the members of Parliament, senior military officers and government officials were noted as supporting the application”.
Meanwhile, an influential group of MPs, Intelligence and Security Committee has demanded a response to why they were not informed about the Afghan data leaks.
Mr. Shaps said that the influential committee was kept in darkness because “from time to time, the things that are going to be secret, once they go out for more people, struggle to be completely secret”.
He said: “You can argue that that circle should actually be widespread, but in the end, number one priority was to ensure that we protect life and people were not killed.
“It is a very great decision to make, and the more you open it, the more likely you are.”
Sir Grant also hit the labor, arguing that the superinjunction would soon be removed and it was “long under the present government, as it was under the US”. Sir Kir Stmper has stated that when he came to know about data violations, he was “angry” and pre-miners of Tory have serious questions to answer “serious questions” about the scam.