The former minister claims that he was misled by the fate of the Afghan elite soldiers abandoned by the UK.

The former minister claims that he was misled by the fate of the Afghan elite soldiers abandoned by the UK.

A former Defense Minister has claimed that he was misled on the rights of hundreds. Afghan special force soldier UK to be brought for security, as revealed by Independent,

Former Tory Armed Forces Minister James HeppiWho oversees the cover-up of one Major data violation Who put life up Risk 100,000 Afghans and UK cost of £ 7BNApologies apologized and admitted “We disappointed the country”.

But addressing the fate Afghan special force Known as “Triples”, Those who were left by the UK Due to Taliban’s training in the country and fighting shoulder to shoulder with the British Army, Mr. HePP suggested that his eligibility was misled to bring him into security.

He said: “On one side on the triples. I pushed and pushed the mod for clarification in response to what was said by the press, parliament and campaigners. Over -times, I publicly said what information was given to me by many senior officials and the army. It is very disappointing which proved wrong.”

James HePy was the Armed Forces Minister (PA/Victoria Jones) at the time of leaks ,PA Archive,

Independent After the collapse of Kabul in the Taliban in August 2021, many people were stuck and in danger, urged the government to give grants to the Triples Sanctuary members in the UK.

Now, it has been revealed that initially about half of the commandos identified for transfer to the UK were initially affected by the breech, which became the subject of a Dracian Superinity, as the dataset could fall into the hands of the Taliban.

Mr. HePP admitted: “Debate on triples (a group of about 1,500 Afghans who worked with the UK army) … In the beginning of 2024, it was clear that these soldiers were clear that this was a clear mod’s decision and would require a review with an expectation, many would now be considered eligible.”

ALSO READ  Spending Review 2025 Live: £ 39BN to announce Cheap Homes Plan

Meanwhile, Mr. HePP broke the cover on his participation in the cover-up of the major data breech in February 2022, when an officer sent an email with a document with a details of 33,000 records, and the details of more than 18,000 Afghans who applied for security in the UK.

In response, the government set up a secret route to bring 24,000 Afghans to the UK and received an unprecedented super prohibition to prevent reporting or even what happened.

Mr. HePP said that the data violation revelation was “intestinal-rag” and apologized for his share in the scam.

He said: “I want to forgive my honesty for other current and former defense ministers for data violations, which compromised the details in the ARAP scheme of so many applicants.”

He described his frustration over the “struggle” to resume legal Afghan claims as the system was overwhelmed by illegal arrival.

Sir Ben Walse (James Manning/PA) has apologized ND said that he takes full responsibility for leakage

Sir Ben Walse (James Manning/PA) has apologized ND said that he takes full responsibility for leakage ,PA Archive,

Mr. HePP said: “It was intestinal to find out that a person in the mod was so terrible, although I also came to know that they were incredibly dedicated to those we served in Afghanistan.

“Some people did more to get those who served with our special forces outside Afghanistan. It is incredibly unfair that someone who has done so well and has changed so much life should also be responsible for better. [the operation codenamed] Surefire.

“But the worst part of all, of course, was a mortal danger that we presented this violation to ARAP applicants, whose details were compromised.

ALSO READ  Lydal immediately recalled on the popular kitchen items due to the danger of the fire

“Intelligence assessment was clear: If the Taliban placed its hand in the list, there was a possibility of violent and even fatal vengeance.”

He made it clear that his decision to cover the scam in the courts with a super prohibition was not his decision, actually pointing to the finger on the Defense Secretaries Grant Shaps, Ben Wallace and former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

Similar points have been done by former Home Secretary Sayela Bravemen, who noted that the opposition to what was being decided after the super prohibition came was closed.

Mr. HePi said: “Others decided on prohibition, but what is worth it, I agree that it was needed. Is it needed to increase it, it is a moot – the arguments are fine.

“Anger across the government in the mod above Breach was clear and justified. Some beautiful choice words were introduced in the meetings. But I was suggested that I was running a new eligibility for those who are not eligible for ARAP or ACR, but are influenced by Breach.”

Sir Ben, who was the then Defense Secretary, when the initial legal order was sought, has said that he takes full responsibility for the leak. Mr. Shaps has remained silent on this issue so far.

Join WhatsApp

Join Now