Cair Coward Has increased its anger on the cover-up Horrific data violation He Putting life at 100,000 Afghans at riskAs it emerged, no one faced action on the huge blunder.
The Prime Minister said Should never have been leak And that Tory ministers have “serious questions to answer” a day later The unpreceden,
Ben Walse, who was the then Defense Secretary, when the Drackian legal order was given earlier said that he took full responsibility for the leak, which happened when an MOD officer released a spreadsheet with a spreadsheet with 18,000 Afghans “in mistake”.
But questions have been questioned Anyone has been fired on violationAmid the call for further investigation, put the lives of people with Links of UK forces in danger of rebuke from the Taliban.
It comes as the chairman of a powerful Commons Committee Information Commissioner, Applying pressure to a reconsideration on his decision not to investigate the violations, which cost the taxpayer to transfer thousands of affected Afghans in the UK.
At the beginning of a stress Prime Minister’s question, Sir Kir Expressing our anger, stating the MPs: “We warned against the conservative management of this policy and yesterday, the Defense Secretary set a full range of failures that we inherited: a major data violation, a super prohibition, a secret route that has already spent hundreds of millions of pounds.
“The ministers serving under the party have serious questions to answer about how it was allowed to happen.”
He suggested that conservatives should “welcome” from the Commons Defense Committee, which has vowed to investigate.
A few hours later, in a dramatic intervention, right -wing former Home Secretary Sula Braveraman revealed that the Tory government had a split on the way to deal with the breech and said that it had opposed the superinjunction and the new secret pathway that was established to bring the affected people in the UK.
In a scary statement, Ms. Breverman condemned the former Tory Sarkar, then led by Rishi Sunak, in which she played a major role before the former Prime Minister was dismissed.
He said: “There is a lot that should be said about the operation of the mod, both ministers and officials, and the House of Commons are the right place to do so. I hope we have an opportunity soon.
“What has happened is derogatory and should never be again. So we should be very clear about what it was and how it happened.
“The cover-up was wrong, the super prohibition was wrong, and the failure to stop unwanted mass immigration has been unforgivable. Therefore, I am sorry: the Orthodox government thwarted you and its leaders. It was not quite good. It’s not very good now.”
Mr. Sunak, East-Defense Secretary Grant Csps and former Armed Forces Minister James Hepe, who oversee the cover-up, have been contacted for comment, but there is no broken cover and all are silent on violations.
Amid the call for further investigation in Breach, Defense Secretary John Hele said that “Accountability now starts” after accepting that he was uncomfortable in such a way that the information was covered for three years.
The Commons Defense Committee confirmed that it would begin its investigation, and is writing to the Information Commissioner for an inquiry, Dame Chi Onvurah, chairman of the Community Committee for Science Innovation and Technology.
The Information Commissioner has so far refused to investigate, despite issuing a fine of £ 305,000 for very small modes of data violations.
Dame Chi told Independent: “A leak of this magnitude, of course, is extremely worrying and the fact that it has occurred in the Ministry of Defense, brings an additional dimension of security concerns. The Defense Selection Committee Office (ICO) will work as a complete investigation, meanwhile I will write to the Information Commissioner to seek more information about the role of my office in this matter.”
John Ban, a senior data protection expert from Mishkon D Reiya, expressed his views on the attitude of the commissioner’s breech.
He said: “I have not seen such unanimous unanimous data protection comments on the lack of clear interest of the ICO.
“A possible argument is that a large fine against the mod has no meaning when it will punish the public purse.
“Enforcement is not only about the fine. The Information Commissioner has the power to make a report before Parliament. I have been exploding for years about the issue of data hidden in the spreadsheet, and if I was a commissioner, I would keep wondering how I can raise the issue.
“A report before Parliament will promote them, will increase the issue and seize Parliament.”
ICO has not responded IndependentRequest for comment.
Meanwhile, a member of the Defense Select Committee has warned against naming and teasing the person responsible for the breech and said that the committee should look into the government’s failure.
Confirming the committee, an investigation will begin, its chairman, Labor MP Tan Desi told BBC Radio 4’s The World at One Program: “We want to go to the bottom of what has happened by Parliament, which has been sidelined for a very long time.”
“After all, I think there is no parliamentary investigation into the fact that no one has been noticed it, not at all.”
Calvin Bailey, a Lon and Vanstad Labor MP, who was an important person in organizing flights outside Kabul, when the Army of the Alliban went to a chaotic return after the Taliban came to power in 2021, was called for a “proper investigation” on the matter.
He said: “We need to go back and conduct proper check for everything, not only data violations, whole culture management and operation monitoring, extraction recovery, foreign policy and military engagement and participation.
“We probably find that people were working under Duras and pressure, because there were very few people to deal with the crisis.”
He also warned that the Defense Committee was “best placed to do necessary tasks” as a complete public inquiry “would take too long and very expensive”.