Bill O’Rili knows why Epstein list will never be released.
And he is not just anticipating, he claims that President Trump personally explained him the reason – back all the way on St. Patrick’s Day, which means that we have been waiting for all the release for about 3 months and the decision was already made that it was never coming.
It is related.
Look at this small clip as the reason for the bill explains that it was individually given by the President:
🚨new: Bill O’Sarelly says that Trump argued him not to release the Epstein file.
“I talked about this on President Trump, man to man, eye to eye, St. Patrick’s Day.”
“He said, and I agree: There are a lot of names associated with Epstein which had nothing to do with … pic.twitter.com/ejoroakcje
– Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@Jasonjournodc) 10 July, 2025
🚨new: Bill O’Sarelly says that Trump argued him not to release the Epstein file.
“I talked about this on President Trump, man to man, eye to eye, St. Patrick’s Day.”
“He said, and I agree: There are many names associated with Epstein who had nothing to do with Epstein’s conduct. Perhaps he had lunch with him or maybe there was some correspondence for one or another.”
“If that name goes out, those people get destroyed – because no reference is going to happen. The media does not care about the context – so you cannot do it.”
Chris Kuoomo has his own, some similar principle.
See here:
🚨new: Chris cumo floating principle on why Trump administrator did not release Epstein information
“There is no customer list. And if you keep out the names of people, they are going to sue the government – and they are going to win.”
“Because they are going to show that the government had the reason … pic.twitter.com/qgrxzeuyv
– Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@Jasonjournodc) 10 July, 2025
🚨new: Chris cumo floating principle on why Trump administrator did not release Epstein information
“There is no customer list. And if you keep out the names of people, they are going to sue the government – and they are going to win.”
“Because they are going to show that the government had the reason to know that there was nothing in their relationship with Epstein. And he gave information that was defamation anyway. And that is why it is not so.”
“You are going to ruin the lives of people who had nothing to do with behavior.”
“But when people hear it, it looks like a cover-up.”
I have no reason to doubt the bill.
If he claims that it was from a personal conversation, I think I have to believe him.
But I don’t like that answer, not a bit.
How are you?
Here is my principle: