Sir Kir Stamor So far to boil on cuts in your botched profit, but he Already facing a fresh rebellion,
A similar alliance of MPs And the campaign group, Many of which include charity, which opposed reforms for welfareAre warning Prime Minister Not to cut education schemes for children and youth with special educational requirements and children with disabled.
The PM was badly weakened by the chaos around his planned welfare bill, and backbenchers now know that they can force their leader’s hand if they apply adequate pressure.
But Sir Kir, and his Chancellor Rahel reevesThe pressure on public finance will be deeply aware of the pressure and may reduce another multi-universe pound policy change.
Independent See why the government is pressurizing sending, and what is likely to do about it.
What are education, health and care plans (ECHP)?
An education, health and care plan (EHCP) underlines the support required by people aged 25 and to meet their social care needs.
It is designed to help people with disabilities who need to reach learning and achieve their ability.
Documents are legally binding, based on assessment by professionals and individually determines support to young people.
Are ECHP at risk?
Campaign Group Save our children’s rights have warned that the government is planning to weaken or remove the rights of an ECHP, as well as other rights include the right to participate in a suitable school and the right to get support like speech and language medicine.
It states that the government plans to save money, with the difficulties of learning or support for children with disabilities currently cost £ 12BN a year.
Education department It is said that “there is no plan to remove money or support from children, families and schools”.
“It would be completely wrong to suggest that children, families or schools may experience any loss of money or support.”
Why will the government cut EHCP?
The government first turned to support for the disabled when it demanded the main disability benefit, individual freedom payment (PIP) to slash £ 5BN from the welfare bill through cuts in Personal Freedom Payment (PIP).
The argument was that the bill was growing uncertainly, and National audit office (NAO) has given a uniform warning about echps.
The number of EHCPS between 2015 and 2024 increased by 150 percent to 576,000, NAO estimates that it could be 1 million top by 2033.
What has campaigners said?
One letter Mentor Signed by groups with dozens of special requirements on Monday stated that “every indication of the government suggests that the right of an ECHP is to be removed from children participating in mainstream schools”.
The letter stated, “Whatever the problems of the system send, the answer is not to remove the rights of children and youth.”
It said that removing echps will not magically disappear the needs of young people, but will already increase the application for congested special schools or will completely out of school.
What has MPs said?
A labor MP is preparing to prepare the rebel Independent He is gearing up for a similar fight on backbenchers echps, which he cut into pip.
The MP warned, “They have created strong relations with sand campaigners, if they are now being told that it is a betrayal, they will push back against any cuts,” the MP warned.
Was quoted in another Many times Saying this: “If they feel that taking money from disabled adults was bad, see what happens when they try the same with disabled children.”
When will the changes become clear?
The government is expected to publish a white paper giving details of its reforms to send education in autumn.
This means that ministers have the opportunity to ensure that they gain any improvement, and reverse backbenchers to overcome any possible rebellion on changes.
But long delay also means that disability campaigners will have all the summer to reach the ears of MPs, and rebel labor MPs will have a lot of time to plan rebellion.
Ultimately, the reforms will represent how well Sir Keir heard and learned from the previous handling of politically sensitive changes that Labor makes MPs uncomfortable.
Any change will arise or fall on the fact that it has done the outreach required for the party MPs and the concerned campaign groups have advocated them.
If not, he faces returning from summer vacation, exactly for the same problems he left behind.