The jury reaches the decision on 4 out of 5 counts in the Didi trial, the judge indicates that they will continue to discuss

The jury reaches the decision on 4 out of 5 counts in the Didi trial, the judge indicates that they will continue to discuss

New York (AP) – Jury in Scene “Didi” Combes “ The sex trafficking trial said on Tuesday that it had reached a decision in four out of five cases against hip-hop Mogul and was unable to reach a decision on top charges, conspiring.

The judge indicated that he would direct the jury to accuse the prosecutors and Comombs’s defense team’s sentiments, which was just two days in consultation very soon to reach a decision in all cases.

Judge Arun Subramanian said that he received a note at 4:05 pm on Tuesday evening that the jury had reached a partial decision. The note said that the jury was unable to reach a unanimous decision on the racist conspiracy as both sides were gauge with “unattainable views”.

Subramanian did not see the gamblers to announce their partial decision, without trying to decide the remaining count. He said that the injuries have the right to give a partial decision, but indicated that it is a final measure and in view of the short time, it has deliberately given to the panel, it will give them more time and will wait for a full decision.

Soon after sending the note to court, the lawyers of Comombs surrounded him at the defense table. Hip-hop Mogul Moroz appeared because he explained to him what was happening. At one point, lead defense lawyer Mark Agnifilo stepped away from the bodle, returned with a piece of paper and handed it to the Comombs, who read it completely.

The mother and many of her children returned to court after announcing by the judge that the jury had reached a partial decision.

Meanwhile, the prosecutor, their phones and laptops were on their table sticking to computers.

Assistant American Attorney Maurin Comi suggested that the judge gave the jury a modified version known as an allen charge – instructions encouraged them to encourage them to consider after reaching a deadlock.

ALSO READ  The annual speed of the housing starts from June to 0.4 percent: CMHC

However, defense lawyer Agnifilo said that the jury does not need to help move faster and he does not want them to achieve any form of allen charge.

“I am not asking the court to say a lot because I don’t think this jury needs a lot,” Agifilo said, arguing that the situation is different from those where a jury has gone for some time without reaching the decision on any count.

Racciering Conspiracy – Counting on the Jury’s decision sheet 1 – is most complicated among the allegations against combs as the jury not only needs to decide if he runs a “racketering enterprise”, but also whether he was involved in committing some or all kinds of crimes, such as kidnapping and arson.

The allegation comes under Rico – the Racketer acts of affected and corrupt organizations – known for being used in organized crime and drug cartel cases.

The jury has been discussing since Monday. Earlier on Tuesday, he asked one of the most important witnesses of the prosecution to review the important testimony: How long a long-long girlfriend of hip-hop Mogul.

The gamblers requested the testimony for about 75 minutes in their second day allegations that Comombs used his fame, money and violence to force two girlfriends into drug-fuel. Sex marathon Male sex workers are known as “freak-off” or “hotel nights”.

A panel of eight men and four women asked Kasi’s comments to be beaten, kicked and pulled in a hotel in Los Angeles in 2016-now captured on—fing security camera footage.

He also asked to see the testimony of how about an incident, in which he said that Comombs accused him of taking drugs and kicked his boat at the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2013. After returning to America, he said, he threatened to release her clear video of having sex.

ALSO READ  The McGill University team develops AI that may detect infection before the symptoms appear

In addition, the jury asked about how and stripper Daniel Philip’s testimony, after he jumped on his lap in a hotel in New York City, as Philip testified, he suspected that the combs were slapping and slapping him around a nearby room.

“Her whole body was shaking, as she was nervous,” Philip said, who was in a hotel for a sexual encounter with Kaisi for some time between 2012 and 2014.

Philip testified how he asked how he asked, the R&B singer, whose real name is Cassandra Ventura, was with Comombs if he was killing her and beating her. She said that she told her that she was in real danger. How, he said, “Originally tried to convince me that it’s fine, that’s fine. I’m fine, I will be fine.”

Philip and how were the first witnesses who testified on the commencement of tests last month.

Comombs’ lawyers and prosecutors on Monday soon came to request a jury testimony after the beginning of the day with Judge Arun Subramanian on a jury question left from the end of the first day of discussion.

The gamblers wanted an explanation about what is the merit in the form of drug distribution, one aspect of the allegation of racketoring conspiracy that would help determine whether the Comb could be convicted or exoncrated on counting.

Subramanian said that he would remind him of the instructions given on that part of the case before starting discussions on Monday. Comombs’ lawyers pushed for a more expanding response, but the prosecutors argued – and Subramanian agreed – that doing so could make the gamblers more confused.

On Monday, the panel considered for more than five hours without reaching the verdict.

Defense lawyers are trying to criminalize the Swinger lifestyle of the prosecution Comombs and if anything, his conduct is not federal hooliganism for domestic violence.

ALSO READ  you've got Mail? Canada posts 'clarification' about the flag of Melbox

The 55 -year -old combs may face a 15 -year -old prison in the back of bars, if they are convicted of all the allegations. Comombs, as he performed through a test, was honored with his lawyers carefully as he discussed responding to the jury’s request. Later, he leaned forward to check something on the computer screen that sits in front of him.

After arguing not to be guilty, Comombs chose not to testify as his lawyers created their arguments to acquit through long cross examinations of dozens of witnesses called by the prosecutors, including some employees of some Comombs, who stood unwilling to the witness.

When the gamblers first pulled out of the room to start discussion on Monday, Comombs slipped on his chair on his chair before standing with his family and friends to stand towards three rows of spectators packed and turned to three rows.

Those supporters grabbed their hands and put their head down in prayer, as Combs did, which was several feet away from them in the court well. After they ended, they appreciated together, and so Comombs, still clapping, as soon as he turned in front of the room.

Comombs also showed two books that he is reading: “The Power of Positive Thinking” by Norman Vincent Peel and “The Hapinance Advantage” by Sean Achor.

In the discussion, barely an hour, the jury forces sent a note to the judge, complaining that there was a gamble “which we are worried, cannot follow your honor instructions. Can I please talk with your honor or you can please interview him?”

The judge decided to send a note to the gamblers, which reminds them of their duties intentionally and for compulsion to follow their instructions on the law.

By the end of the day, the jury looked back on the track, sending notes about drug distribution.

Join WhatsApp

Join Now