TV doctor Hillary Jones says that if the law changes, it will help in getting sick to die

TV doctor Hillary Jones Said he will help Sick patient to end his life If the law was replaced, the practice was described as “kind and kind”.

GP, often seen on ITV Good Morning Britain And this Lorraine Show, said the drug will “back in the dark age” The proposed law in Westminster is being considered Voting has been given.

Terminally sick adult (end of life) bill will return to the House of Commons for debate on Friday, in which MPs were expected to consider further amendments.

The bill in its current form, which applies only to England and Wales, means that sick adults with only six months can apply for assistance to eliminate their lives, with two doctors and expert panels with the necessary approval.

Last month, MPs approved the change in the bill to ensure that no Medics would be obliged to participate in assisted dyeing.

Doctor Hillary Jones explains more about Morning sickness breakthrough potential treatment. ,Good morning Britain/ITV,

Doctors already had an opt-out, but the new section extends anyone including pharmacists and social care workers.

Talking to the PA news agency, Dr. Jones said that Medics is currently “looking at his shoulders due to the legal results of the law” because it stands.

Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a 14 -year maximum jail sentence.

When asked about the importance, whether the law changes, Dr. Jones said: “This healthcare will provide relief to professionals who deal with terminal disease.

“There are wonderful people who are taking care and kind, who are just for fear of their actions, being accused of wrongdoing, and due to that fear, people are often subject to treatment at the end of life.

ALSO READ  Delay in demand from over 50 labor MPs in Friday's last Commons

“People are looking at their shoulders due to the drugs that they are using or the dosage they are using means that patients are not getting the best subcutaneous care that they can have.”

Beyond the previous month’s debate on the bill, two Royal Medical Colleges expressed concern over the proposed law.

The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said that it believes that “belonging to deficiencies”, while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPSCH) said that it has “serious concerns” and cannot support the bill.

But Dr. Jones, who have been practicing drugs for more than 45 years and spend time working on cancer wards during their career, stated that he has always supported it (aided dying).

He said: “I have always felt that this is the most human, kind and kind thing that relatives and doctors can provide, knowing that the wishes of that person are respected and known, that there is complete mental ability and they are surrounded by love.”

Asked whether to change the law, he would be satisfied to help someone who had chosen the help of dying at the end of his life, he said: “Of course, if I know the patient, I know what their wishes are, I see them suffering, and I can’t do anything to help them to help them, then, I help them to catch them.”

Some opponents of the bill have urged MPs to focus on improving life care instead of enacting laws to die.

But Dr. Jones said that his mother, who was a nurse and “the best possible purposely care”, “unnecessarily suffering” died, “I will be proud to speak on the subject now, the way I am”.

ALSO READ  'This is not correct': Lords urged the government to end the terms of 'No-Hop' uncertain jail

He explained his respect for people’s “religious beliefs, cultural beliefs and personal feelings”, but in opposition to the aided dying but insisted that it should be an area of ​​choice.

“The bottom line is that I think it is the personal choice of the patient. I think we should respect the person’s rights what they want they want”, he said.

“This is not an essential thing. It is not being implemented to anyone.

“And I think people should have a personal right to decide about how they end their lives if they have a terminal disease where there is no possibility of treatment and they are suffering and they are afraid of an undesirable death.”

Asked about the possibility of the bill being voted by MPs, Dr. Jones said: “We will return back to a class, in the dark era, in my opinion, medically, and it would be a shame. I don’t think if the bill is not near, we will take the medicine forward.”

Our duties of care, a group of healthcare professionals are campaigning against the change in law, said the question should be whether there is a “correct option” if they apply to die as assisted.

A spokesman of the group, Dr. Gilian Wright said: “If someone does not have access to subscriptions, psychological support or social care, are they making a true option?”

“At a time when the NHS is on its knees, when subcutaneous social care is struggling and our wonderful dharamshalas have to cut beds and services due to lack of money, as someone has taken care of people at the end of life, I will urge MPs to vote against this bill, but instead investing in utter experts, careful care and psychological support.”

ALSO READ  Plan to free sexual criminals after half of punishment to deal with jail crisis

Join WhatsApp

Join Now