Add thelocalreport.in As A Trusted Source
As artificial intelligence becomes Go deeper into our daily lives, Schools are increasingly concerned about students using artificial intelligence to help them take shortcuts at work.
Nearly half (43%) of sixth- through twelfth-grade teachers said they Detection using AI Tools for the 2024/2025 academic year, according to a report recent opinion polls By Center for Democracy and Technology.
However, although AI cheating accusations Experts say these behaviors may result in points deductions, academic probation, or even expulsion, and will have serious consequences for the students themselves.
Especially when they are wrong.
“One of the most common feelings students describe to me is feeling anxious and stressed throughout the process, even if they say I’m innocent,” Lucie Vágnerová, a New York education consultant with more than 10 years of experience, tells us. The Independent.
“A lot of them told me they weren’t sleeping well — a lot of them had to seek counseling, and the misconduct process at U.S. colleges and universities tends to take at least a few weeks and sometimes months, so it really felt like a long-term situation that was really affecting their mental health deeply.”
Marley Stevens, a student at the University of North Georgia, was flagged for using AI According to an October 2023 paper USA Today. She used Grammarly, the school’s recommended online spell checker, but still got a zero.
Stevens was placed on academic probation and submitted to a six-month misconduct and appeals process. Despite her protests, the grade on her essay affected her GPA, causing her to lose her scholarship. “I couldn’t sleep or focus on anything,” she told the outlet at the time. “I feel helpless.”
Vagnerova said such experiences ultimately erode trust in the educational process and, ultimately, the core relationship between students and teachers.
“For me, that’s a big issue,” she told The Independent. “Institutions are investing in all this surveillance, but they are not investing in teachers’ ability to build deep relationships with students and build trust and vulnerability.”
Ailsa Ostovitz, a 17-year-old high school student from Washington, D.C., claims she was wrongly accused of using artificial intelligence in three different assignments in two different classes this school year alone.
“It’s mentally exhausting because I know this is my job,” Ostowitz told NPR, “I know it’s my brain putting words and concepts on paper for other people to understand.”
The study also found that such detection systems are limited at best and completely unreliable at worst.
“Detection tools for AI-generated text do fail; they are neither accurate nor reliable,” a study Members of the European Academic Integrity Network found that all tools they assessed scored below 80%.
“Generally, they were found to diagnose human-written documents as being AI-generated (false positives), and frequently diagnosed AI-generated text as being human-written (false positives).”
Even the most advanced AI-generated text detection tools have “serious limitations”, making them unsuitable for use as evidence of academic misconduct and “too easy to trick the system,” the study found.
“We therefore conclude that the system we tested should not be used in academic settings,” the authors wrote.
Still, school districts are looking to adopt AI technology, although there are often strict guidelines for its use.
announcement The Los Angeles Unified School District said it is committed to “utilizing artificial intelligence technologies in an ethical, transparent and responsible manner, while recognizing the importance of protecting student and employee privacy and ensuring that the use of these technologies is consistent with ethical and equity considerations.”
In September, New York City Public Schools Superintendent Melissa Aviles-Ramos announced a four-part framework to ensure the responsible use of artificial intelligence tools in the classroom.
The framework includes preparing students for AI-driven lives and careers, teaching students and faculty to use AI responsibly, reducing bias and ensuring cultural responsiveness when using AI, and leveraging AI to improve operational and instructional efficiencies. “
Ironically, while warning students of the dangers of trusting artificial intelligence without question, many educators may only take the detection system’s judgment at face value. Vagnarova said if institutions are to continue using such systems, they need to improve their AI literacy.
“I think a lot of people would think the solution is more accurate surveillance,” she told The Independent. “To me, it’s kind of the opposite.”
“I think AI testing has a role to play in education, but it’s a much smaller role than it is today. Ultimately, I think institutions and governments need to invest in compensating educators so that they have the space to do meaningful assessments that measure student growth.”
The ENAI study authors agree.
“Our findings strongly suggest that a ‘simple solution’ for detecting AI-generated text does not exist (and may not even exist),” the authors wrote.
“Thus, rather than continuing to focus on detection strategies, educators should continue to focus on prevention and continue to rethink academic assessment strategies. Written assessments should focus on the process of student skill development rather than the final outcome.”